I believe in my case, it has always functioned this way. Charge now goss to 100%, and has as long as I've had the truck (1 year). Just accepted that this was just the way it was and would set an alarm to remind me when to stop it.
Fyi, if you are an Android user, that update also enables Android Auto to make trip planning using your trucks parameters much more like Tesla trip planned. It gives you estimated SOC on arrival, charging stops, estimated time at charging stop, etc. I have had a very positive experience using AA...
Some believe Ford has tweaked the charging curve since introducing the truck, but doesn't not change the official specs. Seems reasonable to not change the official specs so as to reduce the number of complaints.
I have the same to say about using Google maps routing. This past weekend, I tested it on a longer day trip. It seemed to account for wind, elevation, and temperature effects. In fact it was a little conservative resulting in a arrival with a few percent more than estimated. Like partly due to...
Research shows that typical US drivingay prolong useful EV battery life.
https://electrek.co/2024/12/10/ev-batteries-may-last-up-to-40-percent-longer-than-expected-stanford/
Not saying this is the issue, but when the Bucees in Springfield MO opened with V4 stands, it was something like 8 weeks before it opened to non-Teslas. Seems they wait a while before activation for other EVs.
OP, another thing comes to mind. Wonder if it's the CC tied to the account? Expired...
I personally don't trust CR anymore. I have seen top much obviously cherry picked data, or skewed article in search of a predetermined conclusion. JMHO
Just to be completely clear, my post was about Android Auto new functionality with the Lightning, and not the Ford Nav. Also to be clear, AA starts automatically when I turn the truck on. On the occasions where it fails to connect by Bluetooth, I just plug my Android phone in if I want to use it.
I used it in the last week, and it worked. Also have several instances of navigation with AA and the estimated SOC have been close and a bit conservative. Meaning estimated 48% SOC on arrival of a 100ile drive, and actual SOC arrival 50%. I'm good with it being conservative. So far IMHO AA...
I have seen several times that SK On was a LG spinoff, but taking a brief look around, I don't see anything supporting that.Maybe misunderstood or something. So SK On it is. I would still lemon law the truck for reasons stated.
IMHO Lemon Law while you can. Obviously LG was not having a good day/week that your battery cells were manufactured. Once, Ok, things happen Twice... And things just got very very suspect.
Seems the great and mighty can do no wrong Tesla couldn't or wouldn't meet their NEVI obligations in Oklahoma. So much for the ideal Tesla should have gotten the NEVI funding.
https://electrek.co/2024/12/03/tesla-loses-out-to-evgo-in-oklahomas-nevi-ev-charger-rollout/
I have used P&C for both EA and Tesla. You are not double billed. You are billed the non-member rate for the site through your Ford account. You WIL NOT get a discounted price even if you are a member for a lower kwh rate. It has worked very well for me to date
Than you, Good to know. Key ofy point is that Tesla is doing no better on the NEVI sites than anyone else, and in fact have issues deploying at already permitted sites.