adoublee
Well-known member
I'd like to be able to relatively simply parallel on-site solar with the truck so that draw from truck can be reduced when home load exceeds solar generation, and solar can put charge into truck when solar production exceeds home load. This is a contingency for something that extends beyond a few days without utility power, so value will certainly depend on implementation cost. It is not certain this will work with the "intelligent home backup" route, but is almost certain to not work through the bed outlet that is not intended to receive a charge.You can always just use the 240 volt/30 amp outlet in the bed (with the pro power option) and run a cord to a transfer switch connected to your main panel. I live in FL, and have a transfer switch that runs essential circuits (fridge, well pump, microwave, etc.). The F-150 with short range battery would run my emergency needs for days. I'm not interested in having the F-150 automatically start, and run the whole house. I would actually prefer to plug it in, turn on the needed circuits when I want. I do understand that with the F-150 hybrid there has a grounding requirement that means you need a compatible transfer switch, but those are only $150-300. I suspect that will be true of the LIghtning as well. I will be very happy to get rid of my generator and use the Lightning just as I would the gen
Also, the 240V outlet in the bed has the 7.2kW limit and the intelligent home backup route is supposed to support 9.6kW, and I'd like all the power I can get - again within the bounds of value.
My current guesstimate is that the inverter being referenced is in regard to for this system is simply a small inverter that performs a grid-forming (voltage-forming) output for the truck to feed AC into. This would be a smallish-inverter dedicated to the "dark start battery" now being referenced to come with the HIS.
One other piece of potentially supporting evidence here is that a retention slot can be seen in the center of the image with a CCS connector that has been produced (I have never seen the video by Car and Driver this is said to be clipped from). Clearly the end was not placed back in that opening which in this environment surprises me and suggests the CCS end on this cable might not actually fit into the opening. Again, there has been no other indication the end will be CCS other than this photo apparently obtained during a Car and Driver journalist visit.