Search results

Me too. Finally got the charge app too. Whoop Dee Doo. Looks like the 23’s are getting 6.5 while the 22’s are getting 6.14. I love this truck, but Ford’s update system sucks. It’s sad that I can’t wait to get pct on the gauge cluster. I’ve given up hope for anything useful…like BlueCruse...

Target seems coincidental to me. TARGET just updated their app and added CarPlay support. I have it too.

Yay @Mike G Boo @Ford Motor Company

Sorry, but that article is a year and a half old. Ford has since decided against it. Too much negative feedback I suspect. https://www.thedrive.com/news/ford-abandons-self-repossessing-car-tech-at-least-for-now Still, if you finance, make payments or you don’t deserve the car. 🤷🏽 Old news.

I'd be interested in this too. Not sure which version I need...I gotta read through this thread! If I can get a harness I'll order the comma same day!

Yeah, it's too bad the tech is so far behind on the Lightning. One thing I miss from my Tesla MYP is the constant, feature laden updates. Actual changes not "your speakers are better now" or "if we ever update updates will be smoother now" or "percentage on dash!" changes. The blended...

Oh my God you are impossible. You admit the CT API is better (last I knew we were discussing CT vs Lightning) than Lightning. So you can't win that argument, so instead you switch to charger and charger APIs. Seriously, do you "hear" yourself? I'm out. It's SOOO obvious that the tech of the...

Great...one point of many. There's no evidence it's worse and it's hard to believe that "more power" is ever a wash.

The estimated time of completion is a piece I didn't see...and I always manipulated the amperage directly through the car's API. The Tesla charger that I'm using doesn't have that control via API.

Easy and already expressed, so why repeat myself? I'll do it just for you, "bro." The CT is much more advanced technologically, and that isn't an opinion...it's fact. 4 wheel steering, air suspension, 48 volt architecture and software are all factually more advanced. There. I said it again...

Are you able to adjust charging speed by manipulating amperage? Get back from the car the estimated time of charge completion? Two very important pieces to my use case. When I checked in March, that was not possible.

Except you're not, "bro". Your ad hominem attacks tell me you have nothing left to argue.

Clearly you have no valid points to argue. Have a nice day.

While technically true, Ford's API is useless. You can't do anything close to what you can do with Tesla's. The code I wrote to control and charge my Tesla is impossible with Ford's API. Saying it is "a little more limited" is absurd. It's close to useless! I was hoping back in March that...

Is reading not your thing?

Given the price difference, vanity has to be high up on the list of reasons. I could have bought two Lariats for the price of a single CT. Makes no sense. If you want it primarily for utility I don't see how it beats the Lightning, aside from ground clearance.

Now all of that I agree with. I'm not trading my Lightning for a CT. I have the one I prefer, regardless of who has better (more advanced) tech. I despise the "look at me" attention it gets. No thank you.

STRONGLY disagree with this statement. :) Have a nice day.

4 wheel steering is more about turning radius than skidpad numbers. Skidpad is suspension, tires, center of gravity, etc. Lots of things go into that, but 4 wheel steering has little, if anything, to do with it. I'm talking about turning radius when I say it turns like a boat, not agility. I...

Sure 4 wheel steering and air suspension have been around forever. That doesn't change the fact that the CT has them and the F150 doesn't. I especially wish it had air suspension. 4 wheel steering should be nice (this thing turns like a boat,) but not necessary. Still...tech win for CT. I...