RonTCat
Well-known member
Tesla vehicle "durability" will be an issue for them as long as they have a California assembly plant.
Why?
The labor cost in California is the highest in the world, by a substantial margin. How do you make up for that? You design a vehicle with a focus on minimizing the number of parts/parts to assemble, and the minimum amount of fasteners. What this leads to is a design where you really have fewer parts (and fasteners) then you would really like to have. You can sell it as a "minimalist design", but it's ultimately a company survival choice, and if I was Tesla, would do the exact same thing. The end result is a vehicle which most people perceive as "lower quality", and in reality will not hold up as well over time. It is a good engineering choice for Tesla, as people will still buy their vehicle despite this.
An unintended side effect is Sandy Munro will heap praise on you for your efficient design, but that efficiency does come at the expense of the customer experience.
Why?
The labor cost in California is the highest in the world, by a substantial margin. How do you make up for that? You design a vehicle with a focus on minimizing the number of parts/parts to assemble, and the minimum amount of fasteners. What this leads to is a design where you really have fewer parts (and fasteners) then you would really like to have. You can sell it as a "minimalist design", but it's ultimately a company survival choice, and if I was Tesla, would do the exact same thing. The end result is a vehicle which most people perceive as "lower quality", and in reality will not hold up as well over time. It is a good engineering choice for Tesla, as people will still buy their vehicle despite this.
An unintended side effect is Sandy Munro will heap praise on you for your efficient design, but that efficiency does come at the expense of the customer experience.
Sponsored