TRP
Well-known member
You'd have to filter that make for CCS (DC Fast) and then the locations thin out. Charging 1772 is not realistic for road trips.
There's been numerous reports over the last two years of various software and hardware issues making it hit-or-miss to get an EA charger to work with a given car. There's at least one post here of someone arriving at an EA and charging his Mach-E then a VW driver came over to see how he got it working because it wouldn't charge their ID.3 (or whatever it was.)
I'm optimistic that Ford/Rivian/VW and EA (and the various levels of government) are going to do a lot of network build out before the Lightning sells enough units (say 2023?) to overload the network.
The thing I'd like Ford to focus on is rate of charge – if the Lightning can suck down 80kWh at 350kW that's about 20 minutes at the "pump" and 80kWh is about 250-300 miles (optimal) … averaging 70 mph, that's 3+ hours in the seat and that's as long as I want between breaks … the F-150 Prius can do 500 miles between breaks at 80+ mph and I'm often very ready to get out of the cabin by the time the messages start popping up saying there's "only" 50 miles in the tank.
That was filtered for CCS, no L2. I'm aware of the drawbacks to L2 if road tripping. I've been through VA numerous times and DCFC'd all along I81 up into MD.
Numerous reports and anecdotal evidence aside, I personally have never had to leave an EA station to find another one. Like I said, I have had to switch machines at the same location to get one to work but never had to flat out leave. I still don't believe the fail rate or getting zero charge from a given location is anywhere near 50%
Sponsored