world2steven
Well-known member
There are two huge omissions in this discussion. The largest is the failure to insist that the ‘externalities’ connected with burning fossil fuels be converted to ‘internalities’, i.e. that people who drive vehicles with internal combustion engines be assessed for the damage they do to the environment and the health of the people with whom they share the planet. Until we insist that externalities become internalities, nothing is going to change. That the transition to EVs is a huge undertaking is no excuse for postponing the discussion of this issue.
The second issue is the ‘fairness’ of assessing EVs at the same rate as their ICE equivalents. When I bought my Volt in 2013, it was almost twice as expensive as its Chevy Cruze equivalent. I don’t know what the ratio is now but I am guessing EV buyers pay at least 25 -35% more than those who purchase an ICE equivalent. Assessing use taxes on the basis of MSRP is adding insult to injury.
The second issue is the ‘fairness’ of assessing EVs at the same rate as their ICE equivalents. When I bought my Volt in 2013, it was almost twice as expensive as its Chevy Cruze equivalent. I don’t know what the ratio is now but I am guessing EV buyers pay at least 25 -35% more than those who purchase an ICE equivalent. Assessing use taxes on the basis of MSRP is adding insult to injury.
Sponsored