seems like an argument in logic vs practice to me. If you regen slowly (smoothly) then it shouldnāt be different than braking smoothly at the same rate. If youāre one of those EV drivers making your passengers want to puke because you fully jump off the accelerator, then I doubt youāre also smooth at braking with friction brakesā¦. I fully get the logic, but I donāt see it being meaningful in practice.Here is a quote from an article that itself is quoting a Michelin official:
āTorque to me: EV tires wear down faster
Electric vehicles also exert more torque, or rotational force, than equivalent gas-powered cars.
This happens for two reasons: The highly efficient electric drivetrains deliver sports-car-like acceleration, even in a boxy little compact. That means EVs put more pressure on tires than vehicles that accelerate more slowly.
EVs also exert torque in reverse through regenerative braking. This is the feature that takes energy from a car slowing down and converts it into a little extra charge for the battery.
Any type of braking applies torque on the tires, Shepherd said. But EVs do this more often, and they skip the coasting period between acceleration and braking, jumping straight from propulsion to regenerative braking.
āThat additional braking does contribute to the faster wear of the tires,ā Shepherd said.
This leaves an EV driver with two options: mentally prepare to replace EV tires more frequently, or invest in tires with greater āwearā or longevity.ā
I think we are all about to witness and experience a big evolution in tires. The demands of EVs are one thing. But the new science (and litigation) linking tire chemicals to mass die-offs of coho salmon in Puget Sound is likely more consequential in terms of local environmental impacts. If current tire chemistry is a nearly guaranteed death sentence for salmon, it probably isnāt good for other living things in all sorts of places far from salmon streams outside Tacoma. Iāll wager that 5 years from now we will be dealing with a very different ā and better ā product.Why would regenerative braking wear the tires any more noticeably than just having gobs of torque available. Who brakes lighter than regen?
What's the mi/kwh you're getting with with the Coopers and cold weather? Road and Trail AT are one the choices I consider as my next set....I went with the Cooper Discover Road and Trial AT. Nice tire, looks great on the truck, minimal road noise BUT major loss in efficiency. Plus add the cold weather now and uuugh!...
I'm actually on the first road trip (235 miles) since getting them. Temperature during the drive was approximately 45 degrees, I averaged 70 mph, not a whole lot of wind, and got 1.7 - 1.8 mi/kwh.What's the mi/kwh you're getting with with the Coopers and cold weather? Road and Trail AT are one the choices I consider as my next set.
Iāve decided that Iām going to also replace my Primacy XCās with Defender LTX M/S2. Iām right in the same wheelhouse with having to replace the Primacyās at 32k-33k. Iād be very happy with 50-60k if that turns out to be the case.All things being equal, Iād guess Iāll get closer to 50-60k out of these. I had Primacyās on my ā18 F-150 and looked the same at 38k miles as the one I just replaced with 33k. The Primacyās are quiet when new but donāt last long (400+_ tread wear) , arenāt great in snow, and cup on the edges. Plus, theyāre almost the same price as Defenders.
If you don't mind me asking, what kind of ware do you have? Is it mostly on the outer edge/shoulder of the front tires?Ford noted uneven wear on my Primacyās and recommended an alignment