BlueCruise, Charging Networks, and Trip Stats

[RDeFran]

I am in the process of installing two Blink i200 smart chargers at my Euro shop right now, right near the crossroads of two interstates.

Sponsored

 

[Ruination]

The Rivian is like 2/3 the frontal surface area of the F-150, not really surprising.

 

[Stlww18]

No exactly encouraging for the useable highway range on my Pro….though it’ll have less weight and more efficient tires

 

[Roy2001]

And yet his average speed is 51mph?

Nonsense....

Let's see, the comparison would be interesting. I think Lightning efficiency should be very close to Rivian.

 

[Maquis]

From his previous posts, the temperature is in Celcius which is well within the Temps that batteries like.
It is still concerning that it is that far off EPA ratings as I can't see just going 70mph reducing it by about 20% (highway is less than the 300miles but can't remember the exact number)

Don’t forget the mentioned 9 MPH headwind. His reported efficiency is close to what I’d expect.

 

[greenne]

Don’t forget the mentioned 9 MPH headwind. His reported efficiency is close to what I’d expect.

I agree. I don't know why people are so surprised..

267mi(EPA highway for Platinum)--->215mi is ~20% reduction.

9mph headwind + 75mph = 84mph

At 84mph I could totally believe a 20% reduction...

 

[WFordKid]

Original post here: https://geekyschmidt.com/personal/travel/tech/ev/lightning/2022/05/27/drivingfeedback.html

Charging Network

Our Tesla, when it sits for a few days, can drop significant battery capacity, so when we pulled up to Mackinaw City, I wanted to be sure we had more than the 70 miles we had. I put into the Ford’s GPS the closest high-speed charger and navigated.

The filters available in the GPS are odd. Coming from Tesla’s SuperCharger network, I am used to clicking on the screen to select the EV station, its speed, and available stalls. You are given a series of numbers corresponding to the EV charger on the map on the Ford system. Until you click on it, there are not a ton of details. Not great UX.

We pulled into the ChargePoint at the Odawa Casino near the ferry stop. Oddly there was a Rivian also parked there!

He indicated this was his first EV and that he wasn’t sure if he was using the charger right, but it wasn’t working. I figured maybe, as a first time EV owner, he didn’t understand the process. Nope. He was right; the station wasn’t working.

Fawlty Towers of Chargers

The Rivian owner called and complained to ChargePoint and left. I sat there for a bit, hoping the system, now with only one EV plugged in, could provide some juice.

When the screen turned red and the charger indicated a fault. And then another fault.

I pulled out from one stall and moved to one a few spaces down.

Fault.

Keep in mind that it would charge me for connecting every time I did this. I believe there were 10 dollars in fees for what amounted to a waste of time. At this point, I had something I hadn’t had in many years.

Range Anxiety

Sitting there with my family in the back, growing upset, I felt uneasy that maybe taking the F-150 Lightning on this first trip wasn’t a great idea. To be honest, I hadn’t done a ton of research into the charging networks up north other than validating there were stations.

With our Tesla, I just put in the route I want to take and let it deal with it.

Instead of catching the ferry, I felt we needed to get some charge before we left. I feared that if we didn’t have juice, we wouldn’t be able to get back to a functional highspeed charger. I put into the GPS the next nearest charger and double-backed 30 miles to Indian River.

High Speed?

EV networks we need to talk. If your charger cannot provide 125kw+ juice, please stop labelling it at high-speed. The station we were able to get back to provided us 50-70kw. We sat until we had 125 miles on the tank (~30 minutes) and headed back to the ferry.

BlueCruise

I had a chance to compare BlueCruise to our 2019 Tesla M3, and they are similar in idea but different in execution. Given we only have the AutoPilot (not the FSD beta), they are identical in what each vehicle can provide.

BlueCruise does better than our Tesla in driving along the highway as the driver. I mean that changing lanes, braking, etc., are more manageable to transition between than the Tesla. You can tell that the Tesla was designed with complete autopilot in mind, so turning it off to switch lanes and back on is clunky.

I think Ford accepts that total autopilot will not happen for many years, so it was built with the driver being more involved with the lane switching, cruise, etc. I don’t think this is a bad thing. Ignoring Elon’s antics for a moment, it will likely be many years before Level 5 is a reality.

Ping Pong

BlueCruise has the unfortunate issue that it ping pongs along the lane lines. You can tell it is compensating with going too far and then back. At highway speeds, it can be slight nausea-inducing. I have read a few reviews of the tech on other autos Ford produces, and no one mentioned it, so I am not sure if it is something wrong with my truck or if no one else has compared it to other platforms.

I want to quantify that these ping pong moments are not 100% of the time, but they are often enough that my wife, riding shotgun, asked what was wrong with the system a few times.

Trip Stats

I shared my trip stats online on a few mediums, but given all the questions, I figured before I get started, I would consolidate the information here:

• Cargo for this trip was two adults, a toddler, a suitcase, and two bikes
• The weather is 4-22C (42F-72F)
• The average speed was 75mph, with no hotdogging
• The trip started with a 100% battery

You can see the trip profile (thanks to @ktamsPDX); it’s a bit of a grade. I will post the stats on the return also.

The trip summary of 152.6 miles what was your battery percentage at this point?