vvgogh
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #1
What's the lightning's energy density of the high voltage battery? I've seen some early references to an 1,800 lb battery. Does that correspond to the standard range vehicle's 107.6 kWh? If so, then it's 107.6 Wh / 818.18 kg = 131.5 Wh/kg - is that right?
I'm curious how this compares to some solar battery inverter systems primarily used as a buffer to recharge the high voltage battery from truck-roof mounted solar. I'm looking at the ecoflow Delta 3 Plus (27.6 lbs: 81.6 Wh/kg, 1000W solar), Delta Max (48 lbs: 92.4 Wh/kg, 800W solar), Yoshino B2000 (53.6 lbs: 107.2 Wh/kg, 600W solar) as potential buffer batteries. Those buffer battery energy densities numbers include (penalized by) the built-in solar MPPT, DC/AC converter, and casing in addition to their battery; this is a mass expense of the Lightning's inability to charge off solar directly in this comparison.
The high voltage battery will recharge the low voltage 12V. It's lame that doesn't work in reverse. I hope the next architecture generation will use a 48V low voltage battery and natively support charging the high voltage battery.
I'm curious how this compares to some solar battery inverter systems primarily used as a buffer to recharge the high voltage battery from truck-roof mounted solar. I'm looking at the ecoflow Delta 3 Plus (27.6 lbs: 81.6 Wh/kg, 1000W solar), Delta Max (48 lbs: 92.4 Wh/kg, 800W solar), Yoshino B2000 (53.6 lbs: 107.2 Wh/kg, 600W solar) as potential buffer batteries. Those buffer battery energy densities numbers include (penalized by) the built-in solar MPPT, DC/AC converter, and casing in addition to their battery; this is a mass expense of the Lightning's inability to charge off solar directly in this comparison.
The high voltage battery will recharge the low voltage 12V. It's lame that doesn't work in reverse. I hope the next architecture generation will use a 48V low voltage battery and natively support charging the high voltage battery.
Sponsored