Sponsored

Bob_Mac

Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
370
Reaction score
231
Location
North Carolina
Vehicles
2021 Ford F-150 Platinum
Occupation
Cyber Security | Developer
I'm not convinced it's a J2534 issue per say but an FDRS issue in general.
Sponsored

 

tonesto7

Well-known member
First Name
Anthony
Joined
Mar 7, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
313
Reaction score
387
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
2021 Lariat 502A | 3.5L EB
Occupation
IT Admin | Software Developer
I'm not convinced it's a J2534 issue per say but an FDRS issue in general.
I agree... I looked at the FRDS logs and it indicated in my opinion so sort of conversion issue with FRDS
 

BHunted1

Well-known member
First Name
John
Joined
Mar 17, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
400
Reaction score
104
Location
Sumner County TN
Vehicles
2021 Ford-150 Platinum Hybrid
Occupation
Retired
Just want to throw this out there for folks going google-eyed trying to compare ab files. I use a free program called Winmerge.
I download my ab data files and rename to an xml file. I also insert the date after the vin in the name: ###_022422.ab.xml - This is just easier so you can see which file is in which side by side panel in Winmerge.
I save them to just a folder called AB where I keep my fdrs data.
Open Winmerge> open file. You'll see a window pop up where you can compare 3 files. I just do the last 2 ab files I downloaded. Use the Prettify xml below and hit compare. Easy to read your ab files. Either scroll through all the highlighted lines or use the search field to get you where you want to go.
Hope that helps. Saves my eyes for sure.
 

Bob_Mac

Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
370
Reaction score
231
Location
North Carolina
Vehicles
2021 Ford F-150 Platinum
Occupation
Cyber Security | Developer
Maybe but Jesse’s VCM II is not showing these issues.
When did he post that? FDRS had an issue with 31.6.2 and came out with an updated one 31.6.4 in less than a week due to the .2 version causing corruption issues...
 

Sponsored

Bob_Mac

Well-known member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
370
Reaction score
231
Location
North Carolina
Vehicles
2021 Ford F-150 Platinum
Occupation
Cyber Security | Developer
I'm seeing the same issue in my as-built data. @tonesto7, please keep us updated on how you resolve. Thanks!

View attachment 40954
What device are you using to connect, i.e. VCX Nano, Mongoose, etc.? We're trying to put all the pieces together to see if we can resolve or have to wait on Ford for an updated FDRS.
 

BlackSheep

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
64
Reaction score
5
Location
Indiana
Vehicles
2021 F150 Powerboost
What device are you using to connect, i.e. VCX Nano, Mongoose, etc.? We're trying to put all the pieces together to see if we can resolve or have to wait on Ford for an updated FDRS.
I used the VCX Nano to update my truck.
 

JEB

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 15, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
576
Reaction score
393
Location
Northern Illinois
Vehicles
2021 F-150 Lariat Powerboost
When did he post that? FDRS had an issue with 31.6.2 and came out with an updated one 31.6.4 in less than a week due to the .2 version causing corruption issues...
It was a PM.

EDIT: It was also posted earlier and it might have been been a VCM3. See post 300.
 
Last edited:

Lodans

Active member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
42
Reaction score
26
Location
Austin, Texas
Vehicles
2021 F150 Powerboost King Ranch
Occupation
Building Automation
I used the VCX Nano to update my truck.
I'm in the same boat. VCX nano

<NODEID>
712
<F110>DSMU5T-14F548-DB</F110>
<F111>MU5T-14G009-DC</F111>
<F113>MU5 T-14F548-DD</F113>
<F129>MU5 T-14G009-EA</F129>

<F159>030000</F159>
<F15C>051103</F15C>
<F15E>030804</F15E>
<F160>062500</F160>
<F161>021906</F161>
<F188>MU5T-14G003-DD</F188>
<F18C>2010</F18C>
</NODEID>

<NODEID>
7D0
<F10A>MU5T-14G680-AA</F10A>
<F110>DSMU5T-14G670-EG</F110>
<F111>MU5T-14G681-KF</F111>
<F113>MU5T-14G670-PNL</F113>
<F124>MU5T-14G677-ABA</F124>
<F129>ML3T-14G00T-18K811-AA</F129>
<F12A>ML3T-</F12A>
<F12B>ML3T-18B955-BE</F12B>
<F12C>FFF1-14F180-FE</F12C>
<F142>MLBE10218S</F142>
<F143>20210224041110</F143>
<F144>R3W9QDWA</F144>
<F16B>MU5T-14J003-AF</F16B>
<F17F>1SN12C11</F17F>
<F188>MU5T-14G676-EG</F188>
<F18C>FUBCH20346051212</F18C>
<F190>Vin Number</F190>
<F1D0>28385C047D1D</F1D0>
<F1D1>28385C047D1E</F1D1>
</NODEID>
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

iceman77

Well-known member
First Name
Pete
Joined
Dec 29, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
381
Reaction score
275
Location
Dallas
Vehicles
2022 Ford F-150 Platinum
I'm in the same boat. VCX nano

<NODEID>
712
<F110>DSMU5T-14F548-DB</F110>
<F111>MU5T-14G009-DC</F111>
<F113>MU5 T-14F548-DD</F113>
<F129>MU5 T-14G009-EA</F129>

<F159>030000</F159>
<F15C>051103</F15C>
<F15E>030804</F15E>
<F160>062500</F160>
<F161>021906</F161>
<F188>MU5T-14G003-DD</F188>
<F18C>2010</F18C>
</NODEID>

<NODEID>
7D0
<F10A>MU5T-14G680-AA</F10A>
<F110>DSMU5T-14G670-EG</F110>
<F111>MU5T-14G681-KF</F111>
<F113>MU5T-14G670-PNL</F113>
<F124>MU5T-14G677-ABA</F124>
<F129>ML3T-14G00T-18K811-AA</F129>
<F12A>ML3T-</F12A>
<F12B>ML3T-18B955-BE</F12B>
<F12C>FFF1-14F180-FE</F12C>
<F142>MLBE10218S</F142>
<F143>20210224041110</F143>
<F144>R3W9QDWA</F144>
<F16B>MU5T-14J003-AF</F16B>
<F17F>1SN12C11</F17F>
<F188>MU5T-14G676-EG</F188>
<F18C>FUBCH20346051212</F18C>
<F190>Vin Number</F190>
<F1D0>28385C047D1D</F1D0>
<F1D1>28385C047D1E</F1D1>
</NODEID>
The 712 (SCMG module) field F113, F129 are certainly Network Scan related corruptions. The 7D0 (APIM module) is not. I have see the F12A field like above on trucks that posted self-report and no network scan has been performed for a while (or at all)
 

tonesto7

Well-known member
First Name
Anthony
Joined
Mar 7, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
313
Reaction score
387
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
2021 Lariat 502A | 3.5L EB
Occupation
IT Admin | Software Developer
The 712 (SCMG module) field F113, F129 are certainly Network Scan related corruptions. The 7D0 (APIM module) is not. I have see the F12A field like above on trucks that posted self-report and no network scan has been performed for a while (or at all)
If that's true then my UCDS adapter does not have the same J2534 passthrough corruption that occurs with the VCX Nanos
 
OP
OP

iceman77

Well-known member
First Name
Pete
Joined
Dec 29, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
381
Reaction score
275
Location
Dallas
Vehicles
2022 Ford F-150 Platinum
Maybe but Jesse’s VCM II is not showing these issues.
Jesse uses VCM3 device and this device is not J2534 pass-through device. It uses J1708 and J1939 protocols instead
 
OP
OP

iceman77

Well-known member
First Name
Pete
Joined
Dec 29, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
381
Reaction score
275
Location
Dallas
Vehicles
2022 Ford F-150 Platinum
If that's true then my UCDS adapter does not have the same J2534 passthrough corruption that occurs with the VCX Nanos
Could be VCX Nano firmware bug, could be just baud settings or similar. I did not play with it. I will buy the Mongoose-Plus cable when I get my truck back, test it out and report my results here
 
OP
OP

iceman77

Well-known member
First Name
Pete
Joined
Dec 29, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
381
Reaction score
275
Location
Dallas
Vehicles
2022 Ford F-150 Platinum
If that's true then my UCDS adapter does not have the same J2534 passthrough corruption that occurs with the VCX Nanos
Also, I would wonder how is your UCDS adapter recognized by FDRS. Is it indeed J2534 pass-through device, or perhaps this device supports other protocols (such as J1708 and J1939 as VCM3) ?
Sponsored

 
 





Top