ldavenci
Member
Good argument and outlook, but....Let's use Apple, for example.Understand you and your business was in a different position, and apparently based on some principle rather than market demands - good on you.
But for any business that sells a product, and have loyal, repeat, significant, customers, are you saying they all should equally prioritize relatively unknown, unprofitable, customers?
That sounds unrealistic to me; or, at the very least, a critique that would apply equally against the vast majority of sales businesses, not at all singling out Ford as being somehow unique or uniquely unfair in this way.
Bedsides, your business appeared to take orders and fill them first-come/serve.
Fordās reservations , are/were absolutely peppered with blaring disclosures that they were not an order and provided people with no type of guarantee about receiving any truck, ever.
To say Ford shouldnāt have meant what they said seems a little ā¦ I donāt know ā¦. Much?
Would it be fair that, if Apple were releasing a new product, outside of marketing purposes, that people who were willing to wait in line for days, in a free market for said product, went out into that line and randomly started selecting people when the premise communicated was to wait in line for your first-come, first-serve 'opportunity' to purchase your product?
You are correct that Ford does protect themselves by stating it's not an order, it's an opportunity to purchase, but the marketed intent is that if you are willing to trust us (Ford) to produce the vehicle they are showing, they are willing to allow you to purchase this vehicle earlier than those who are not willing to sign up, pay early. That's all I'm pointing out. I don't care that I have to wait or that I'm not first...but I do believe you need a bit more transparency as to when one can expect to be given that opportunity...other than 'not this year, we'll let you know next year...we'll keep you posted. Reservations are very beneficial to the manufacturers from a production planning, cash flow mgmt, perspective. That is part of the give and take.
Would you deem a customer unprofitable because they only buy three vehicles their entire life but are willing to pay the same amount for the vehicle as the customer who would buy 30 vehicles? Def. no saying all businesses should equally prioritize customers. But let's be honest, This is not a Ford GT that will only be available to a select few and marketed that way which only a few can afford. This vehicle represents a paradigm shift in automotive technology for the masses in which you cannot have the same practices as a Ford GT. I did have a business with a highly sought-after product. My objective was to communicate when the product was coming and could be reserved with cash down and delivered that product based on order list priority. That's it. A list gives you the info you can make your decisions based on. Whether right or wrong, it was straightforward and communicative.
I didn't say Ford was wrong. I said they could do a better job of communication and transparency. I'm not dumping my order and look forward to getting my vehicle. It would be nice to know if it would be before March 2025 tho..lol.
Sponsored