Jarratt
Active member
Before seeing this video I believed that the reason so many CCS1 chargers perform poorly is because of they way they were implemented by various companies that have adopted them. I thought that the right software and hardware might be able to get equivalent performance that is the standard 99+% of the time with the TSLA NACS plug. After viewing the video, I appreciate how much better the engineering is for the TSLA interface. The cable size and nozzle weight are also big deals. I've had to help folks plug in with CCS1.Some really interesting discussion in this video with reference to the architecture behind the charge port. TLDR there is no way they do two charge options side-by-side, future Ford vehicles will be 100% NACS. This surprised me!
Looking out several years, there is no rationale for two competing plugs from a consumer standpoint.
One thing I don't understand is that CCS1 is an open standard available to any enterprise that wants to use it. I believe NACS has never been through the standard-setting slog and is owned by Tesla. Isn't this an impediment to broad option. I would understand why companies that make chargers wouldn't want to be subject to Elon's whims.
Sponsored