Firn
Well-known member
Again, do this yourself. I picked 130% because it is FAR FAR more than what most do and has the worst efficiency. I have done this test multiple times with multiple variations in speed and driving faster comes out ahead.So, driving 85mph instead of 65mph saves a whopping one hour on a 1600mi drive? With an additional three charging stops? What if on one or more of those charging stops, the overhead time ends up being a lot longer due to having to wait in line to charge? And only 15min overhead time assumption? What about the long lines of cars waiting for Buc-ee’s, for example- no way to get in and out of their parking lot in 15min. Adding more charging stops to a trip compounds the risk of a charging queue, or having to use a low power or de-rated charger, or the frustration of a longer-than-anticipated overhead time. And what is the risk of “traffic stop overhead time“ from driving 20mph over the speed limit, for 1600mi (to say nothing of the potential expense in fines and insurance premiums)?
15 minuts is not a short amount of time. That's the amount of time it takes most to get into the car, drive to town, park, and get out. The default is 5 minutes and ABRP has their stuff down pretty good. Can a SINGLE stop take longer? Yes. But this was a quarter of an hour at EVERY SINGLE stop.
I did 2000 miles over a holiday weekend and had ONE stop where I had to wait. Yes, it can happen, but this and getting stopped by the cops is just playing whataboutism. I'm obviously not recommending driving at 130% of the speed limit, again, it was an arbitrary value selected for it's massive inefficiency not as a recommendation. Sheesh
Sponsored
Last edited: