MickeyAO
Well-known member
- First Name
- Mickey
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
- Threads
- 26
- Messages
- 1,050
- Reaction score
- 2,098
- Location
- San Antonio Tx
- Vehicles
- Rapid Red Lightning Lariat ER, Kia EV6 GT-Line AWD
- Occupation
- Retired Lab Manager of the Energy Storage Technology Center
I would suggest that someone with the time and an OBD reader map out the voltages of each SOC.I started a whole thread about this observation. I could not fathom an explanation why, after charging to 100%, I was consistently able to drive 6-10 miles and still be at 100% on the display. My only hypothesis was that Ford had unlocked added capacity, allowing the vehicle to charge beyond 131 kWh. So I asked the question on the forum whether this could be, and asking for other possible answers.
What I got in reply was all over the board, but no one came up with an explanation. When I kept asking the question, I kinda took a beating. The conclusion was basically that my observations must be wrong. Ad hominem attacks. (I did get a personal apology from one of them in a DM.) You can read the thread if you wish. (You will see in my first post that my second hypothesis was the correct one.) It was closed by admin but still exists.
Anyway, this was before I had an OBD scanner, and before I knew the difference between actual state of charge (HVB SOC, as read by the OBD scanner) and displayed state of charge (HVB SOC Display, shown on the dash and also by the scanner as the same data). It was also before I knew that 100% charge did not necessarily equate to 131kWh.
I'm having trouble loading images, but here's what I found.
After charging fully, the scanner showed
Energy 126.18 kWh (not 131); HVB SOC Display 100%; HVB SOC 94.83%
I do not recall how far I drove before the HVB SOC dropped (on the OBD scanner and on the dash simultaneously) below 100%, but I think it was about 8 miles. At that point it showed
Energy 121.74 kWh; HVB SOC Display 99.5; HVB SOC 92.06%
The findings were that a) the truck thought it was 100% charged when the battery had less than 131 kWh (my second hypothesis); and b) there was hidden energy above the HVB SOC Display reading. I used 2.55 kWh of battery before the display dropped below 100%.
I'm relating this for two reasons. One because several people reported the same finding that I had, but had no explanation. When the thread was closed, I could not report there, so I am reporting here. The second reason is to say that scientific knowledge is not the same as sound reasoning.
I appreciate the contributions of those who have put forth useful information. I have learned a lot here. I have narrowed my "delta" (charging more frequently) in order to preserve battery life. I will avoid going below 20% charge when possible. However, I advise people to take the information given them on the forum and apply your own knowledge to reach your own conclusions and decide how you use your truck.
Best to all involved, and no hard feelings. Not trying to take a victory lap here. Just trying to further knowledge.
It can be cumbersome using the method we do to map a cell, but basically you drive it until you are down 10%, wait an hour, read the voltage.
One thing to keep in mind when observations based on displayed SOC are made is the polarization once the load is removed from the battery pack, and that the SOC is most likely based on observed voltage.
It is quite possible that the polarization of the battery pack (voltage going back up after you stop driving) can cause people to misinterpret what the dash is displaying and what they think it should be saying.
Sponsored