https://www.caranddriver.com/news/amp36302930/tesla-model-s-long-range-plus-highway-range-testing/Tesla's sin here is that they are very optimistic about their range estimates. I'm a Tesla owner myself, so I'm very aware of this. Ford hasn't been taking the same estimate strategies as Tesla so I think it's safe to assume driving at reasonable highway speeds will not negatively affect range.
Edit: To iterate further on the 40 MPH question, there's a difference between averaging that speed and holding it constantly. If the Tesla Model S was staying at a constant 40 MPH the whole time, it'd very likely drive the distance of +40% its rated range but if it had occasionally sped up to 80 MPH I wouldn't be surprised to see a lot of loss in efficiency.
Do you have any links to the articles you mentioned earlier?
Sort of... With the most efficient braking possible, the regen will essentially offset the battery loss caused by accelerating from a stop. You will never get enough regen to come out ahead after accelerating away from the stop, so physics won't allow you to get more range using regen while doing and starting frequently. Not stopping at all will always be more efficient than stopping and recouping some power with regen.The slower speeds help in the city, but so does the regen in stop/go city traffic.
The first article you posted has them testing at 75 MPH, and the range is still quite good. The second link has them showing 70 MPH tests nearly matching their rated range.
the second article is just to illustrate the difference in efficiency at different speeds.The first article you posted has them testing at 75 MPH, and the range is still quite good. The second link has them showing 70 MPH tests nearly matching their rated range.
He doesn't know any more than we do.Fleet sales manager at dealer says they expect 40% range reduction at 70 mph
^^^ This is correct. ^^^The slower speeds help in the city, but so does the regen in stop/go city traffic.
Actually the EPA testing requirements for MPG and MPGe include high speed testing up to 80MPH. Even the City portion of the testing averages less than 25MPH but reaches a peak of 56MPH. Highway phase of testing reaches 60MPH a few times and averages just under 50MPH. and the high speed phase are hard accelerations and braking to 45 and 70MPH, with a sustained high speed run that peaks at 80. There are phases of the testing that also include running with the air conditioning maxed and operating in cold weather environments. The complete test cycle simulates 44 miles and takes almost 95 minutes to complete. Whatever the EPA range estimates are, they include the full spectrum of driving conditions.Ford is simulating the EPA cycle which is mixed city and highway speed. The highway speed in this test isnt very fast, I think the average ends up less than 50 mph.
Don't let that 50 MPH average deceive you, average isn't the same as running a constant speed. In many cases running at 70 MPH constantly on the highway will perform better.the second article is just to illustrate the difference in efficiency at different speeds.
If ford’s estimate is based on mixed driving or 50 mph, for example, you would see much lower range at 70, 75, or 80. (All of which are freeway speeds at different places in my state). If the range estimate is based on freeway driving, you could expect far more range in mixed use or lower speed cruising
I don't think anyone would provide any precise data on those. Maybe some Tesla Model X owner can have some inputs (I am pretty sure some brave MX owner uses their SUVs to tow boats) . Aside from that not enough data before first wave of F150 Lightning deliveries.Have to ask out of pure curiosity.... How far will it tow a 7700- 10000 lbs boat (or any trailer)?
From the above details it would seem to be a significant decline.