potato
Well-known member
- First Name
- John
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2024
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 256
- Reaction score
- 409
- Location
- BC, Canada
- Vehicles
- 2023 F150 Lightning XLT ER
4 or 5% for long highway trips for me. Attached screenshot is a cross country trip in my 23 from BC to Ontario and back in early April, so cool temperatures that would've been ideal for a heat pump. I have another 2000 km trip where the trip meter said 4%. I did one trip in -30 C that was 17% but the heat pump is not going to help much in those temperatures anyway I think.I don't own a Lightning so I don't know how much energy use goes to HVAC if you drive your pack down, but assuming it was 10%
That's my point - yes, the heat pump can be a big reduction in the energy used for heating, but that energy for cabin heat is pretty small in the big picture. Even if it's an 80% reduction, which seems optimistic, it would mean climate energy went from 5% to 1%. A ~4% increase in range so ~12 miles on the ER battery.
For an efficient small car it's a bigger percentage. For our behemoths with the gigantic battery, cabin heat isn't as big of a deal. The way I see it.
(Edit to add: that 5% number below includes 7 or 8 nights sleeping in the truck with the heat on.)
Sponsored