Trying to keep more configurations under the 80K limit.I don’t understand why Ford eliminated the dual onboard chargers especially if you have the ER battery??
It seems like maybe the cost cutting moves have gone overboard?
Sponsored
Trying to keep more configurations under the 80K limit.I don’t understand why Ford eliminated the dual onboard chargers especially if you have the ER battery??
It seems like maybe the cost cutting moves have gone overboard?
It also decoupled the FCSP from the ER models, which is a cost cutting move as Ford was giving away the FCSP (let's be real, the cost was baked into the truck's MSRP). Even though it wasn't a line item, I'd have to imagine the FCSP price was included in the ER battery add-on.Trying to keep more configurations under the 80K limit.
Only the 3 year BC option brings the MSRP over 80k, buy the 90 day trial on closing and any tire option and you're still under 80k on the Lariat-ER, obviously the Platinum didn't benefit much as regards the federal tax credit.It also decoupled the FCSP from the ER models, which is a cost cutting move as Ford was giving away the FCSP (let's be real, the cost was baked into the truck's MSRP). Even though it wasn't a line item, I'd have to imagine the FCSP price was included in the ER battery add-on.
Ford removed more features than they added without reducing the price. They should've left the second on board charger.
I have a 2023 Lightening and installed the “included with purchase” Ford Charge Station Pro. Then my wife purchased a Tesla compatible with the Ford charger.United Chargers, who makes all the Grizzl-E EVSEs, is claiming that Ford Lightnings can only charge at 80 amps on the Ford Charge Station Pro.
Has anyone charged at 80 amps (or more than 48 amps) on an AC/L2 EVSE other than the Ford Charge Station Pro?
They are claiming it on their X account in the comments. It is a horrible post, trying to use the '24 as an example, without knowing none have it unless spec'd out in a fleet purchase.
Just a questionable post from a clearly uninformed person mad cause it makes their evse look bad.
The charge at a blink charger that gives me 15 kw ( which are 70amp chargers I believe) and have seen non-Ford 80 amp chargers work on my truck…so I don’t think this is correctUnited Chargers, who makes all the Grizzl-E EVSEs, is claiming that Ford Lightnings can only charge at 80 amps on the Ford Charge Station Pro.
Has anyone charged at 80 amps (or more than 48 amps) on an AC/L2 EVSE other than the Ford Charge Station Pro?
Yep.It's pretty rediculous to put a company on blast off of heresay from a customer (who is probably ill informed of the charge rates). While the poster was trying to get people fired up towards Ford, all they did was get everyone fired up at Grizzl-e/United. The irresponsible post will cost that company sales from 22/23 Lightning customers that think their charger is incompatible. It will also cost them from those of us that won't give Grizzl-e/United our business in the future because of newfounded lack of trust.
capt_ramius,United Chargers, who makes all the Grizzl-E EVSEs, is claiming that Ford Lightnings can only charge at 80 amps on the Ford Charge Station Pro.
Has anyone charged at 80 amps (or more than 48 amps) on an AC/L2 EVSE other than the Ford Charge Station Pro?
I wish we had a say in which features to drop and which to keep. Pipe dream I know. But buyers might gladly do without say, an automatic tailgate if it meant keeping dual onboard charging for future buyers. Idk.It also decoupled the FCSP from the ER models, which is a cost cutting move as Ford was giving away the FCSP (let's be real, the cost was baked into the truck's MSRP). Even though it wasn't a line item, I'd have to imagine the FCSP price was included in the ER battery add-on.
Ford removed more features than they added without reducing the price. They should've left the second on board charger.