Sponsored

First DC charging on the Lightning - with drop-off @ 80%!

beatle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 1, 2021
Threads
23
Messages
885
Reaction score
988
Location
Springfield, VA
Vehicles
Model S, Ridgeline, Miata, motorcycle(s)
Are you saying that if I charge the way Fords recommends that they will see it and allow my Lightning better charging rates? How can they do that on a individual basis?
If it's anything like Tesla (I know, another Tesla comparison) then the truck keeps a record of how many kwh have been added via DCFC vs. L1/L2. It would be relatively simple to program in some logic to choose a lower charging curve once you have added a certain number of kwh via DCFC, or have the DCFC kwh used as the basis for a variable that determines your charging curve so the cut isn't so abrupt. I doubt Ford will do either though.

That's exactly what they did with the Mach-E, and I expect they'll be doing with the F-150. The question is - are Mach-E owners different from F-150L owners, and will F-150L owners "abuse" their vehicles more?

By "abuse" I mean do things that discourage, vs. encourage, battery longevity. Ford has made it clear that they take steps to ensure that at 8 years / 10,000 miles the vehicles have a minimum of 70% of original capacity.

If you watch the video, Darren Palmer hits on some of what they're watching.
I'd wager that those towing longer distances will "abuse" their battery more. They'll have to if they want to make it to their destination. Where Ford draws the line is anyone's guess though.

FWIW at 80k miles, approximately 10% of my Model S's energy has come from a DCFC. I don't plan on towing with the Lightning, but it does have higher range than my S, so I expect even less of my charging to be DCFC.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP

FlasherZ

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Threads
9
Messages
915
Reaction score
1,023
Location
St. Louis Metro
Vehicles
F-150 Lightning, Tesla Model X, F250 SD diesel 6.0

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
79
Messages
4,924
Reaction score
6,480
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
If it's anything like Tesla (I know, another Tesla comparison) then the truck keeps a record of how many kwh have been added via DCFC vs. L1/L2. It would be relatively simple to program in some logic to choose a lower charging curve once you have added a certain number of kwh via DCFC, or have the DCFC kwh used as the basis for a variable that determines your charging curve so the cut isn't so abrupt. I doubt Ford will do either though.



I'd wager that those towing longer distances will "abuse" their battery more. They'll have to if they want to make it to their destination. Where Ford draws the line is anyone's guess though.

FWIW at 80k miles, approximately 10% of my Model S's energy has come from a DCFC. I don't plan on towing with the Lightning, but it does have higher range than my S, so I expect even less of my charging to be DCFC.
Of course Ford knows the vehicle is towing, vs. not towing.
 

LightningShow

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
50
Messages
1,905
Reaction score
2,225
Location
MA
Vehicles
'22 Lariat ER
Occupation
Product Development
I've been getting up to 168 kW on the Signet EA chargers. I don't know what the pack voltage was at that point, but I suspect I was getting pretty close to the 500 amp CCS1 limit. Peak voltage is not going to get better on this generation given the limits of a 400 v system and CCS1 amperage ratings.

I suspect the curve will improve over time given the headroom engineered into the thermal management system. As it stands charging performance is better than I expected when it was announced.
If they can get it to hold 170kW for 15-20 minutes, or 10-70% (for example), that would be a huge win. Grabbing back >150mi in less than 30 minutes would make roadtripping much better.
 

Sponsored

LightningShow

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
50
Messages
1,905
Reaction score
2,225
Location
MA
Vehicles
'22 Lariat ER
Occupation
Product Development
My Bolt only uses 1kW while using AC, so it makes sense that the Lightning would use about 4kW with multiple compressors and fans.
 

Amps

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 21, 2022
Threads
5
Messages
1,332
Reaction score
1,500
Location
Mid-Atlantic
Vehicles
Bolt
My Bolt only uses 1kW while using AC, so it makes sense that the Lightning would use about 4kW with multiple compressors and fans.
I still haven't seen any confirmation that the Max Tow compressor activates in anything other than when towing in Tow Mode. A lot of comments about how much fan action there is with Lightning DCFC could be a clue that it does. With ID.4 HVAC consumption at around 3kW, 4kW on a Lightning could mean it's mainly cabin climate, especially in this weather.
 

LightningShow

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
50
Messages
1,905
Reaction score
2,225
Location
MA
Vehicles
'22 Lariat ER
Occupation
Product Development
I still haven't seen any confirmation that the Max Tow compressor activates in anything other than when towing in Tow Mode. A lot of comments about how much fan action there is with Lightning DCFC could be a clue that it does. With ID.4 HVAC consumption at around 3kW, 4kW on a Lightning could mean it's mainly cabin climate, especially in this weather.
It’s tough to say precisely since the rounding error is so large at low power usage. 3kW could be 2501W and 4kW could be 4499W. My Bolt says 1kW even when the AC isn’t running (sometimes it will drop to 0.5kW, which is the only time it shows fractional kW). An AC compressor probably only uses 500-1000W while operating. So even 3 simultaneously running compressors is probably only around 2kW. I guess my assumption is that the second AC compressor in the cooling loop would switch on whenever there is a call for cooling. I don’t see a reason to add additional compressor controls just for towing.
 

jefro

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
699
Reaction score
231
Location
Texas
Vehicles
F150, Corvette, Bolt EV,
With the existing battery chemistry they will never allow full rated DC to higher percentages. You simply can't squish the electrons in.
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

FlasherZ

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Threads
9
Messages
915
Reaction score
1,023
Location
St. Louis Metro
Vehicles
F-150 Lightning, Tesla Model X, F250 SD diesel 6.0
With the existing battery chemistry they will never allow full rated DC to higher percentages. You simply can't squish the electrons in.
No one said anything about full rated DC.

The steep cliff at 80% and later 90% are excessive drop-offs, though.
 

jefro

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
699
Reaction score
231
Location
Texas
Vehicles
F150, Corvette, Bolt EV,
Yes they did. What are you reading?
 

beatle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 1, 2021
Threads
23
Messages
885
Reaction score
988
Location
Springfield, VA
Vehicles
Model S, Ridgeline, Miata, motorcycle(s)
170kw is actually pretty good given the truck's
Yes they did. What are you reading?
I don't see anything related to "full rated DC" in this thread. It's only been mentioned that the charging rate abruptly drops in half when reaching 80%. This could be more of a taper, perhaps gradually dropping to 60kw by 90% or such. This would still allow relatively fast charging above 80%.

Besides, it's still easy to "squish electrons in" when you're only charging at 1C. I remember charging my lithium RC batteries at 1C for longevity. 1C is 131kw on the Lightning ER.
 
OP
OP

FlasherZ

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Threads
9
Messages
915
Reaction score
1,023
Location
St. Louis Metro
Vehicles
F-150 Lightning, Tesla Model X, F250 SD diesel 6.0
Yes they did. What are you reading?
I searched for "full" and you're the first person to mention it in this thread, so... no they didn't.
Sponsored

 
 





Top