This.I don't believe this was a strategic move at all, this was just a temper tantrum. That being said, this move will have the accidental consequence of weeding out anyone who isn't a true believer/sycophant from the rolls. You'd have to really believe in the company to put up with this BS as an employee.
I wonder if it's immediate financial issues [juggling AP's and AR's] or cult of personalities that drove this action, I'd love to hear more from the CFO......The inside story, according to Reuters:
https://www.reuters.com/business/au...-firings-tesla-supercharger-staff-2024-05-15/
Yup, so it is all exactly as bad as it sounded. What a shitshow.The inside story, according to Reuters:
https://www.reuters.com/business/au...-firings-tesla-supercharger-staff-2024-05-15/
Tesla advantage is battery tech and that SC network. I am seeing a selloff of TMC to one of the big three, maybe even Tesla just becoming a battery/SC network supplier.Just my two cents,
Reading between the lines, Elon feels the competitive advantage Tesla once enjoyed with ev’s is diminished daily, and with all the federal subsidies on the charger network, he likely sees the same. He was quoted the other day as saying it was a mistake to think of Tesla as a car manufacturer. I remember Louis Black had a pretty good comedy routine about that quote as well.
These signs to Tesla point to directing revenue to other areas. Areas that Musk feels they will regain the advantages that Tesla once enjoyed with the automobiles. They simply won’t see the return value per dollar spent as they once did if they continue with cars and charging.
This was dictated with speech to text, so apologies for any strange grammar syntax errors
Haven't read it...but am not a fan of Isaacson. I'd trust the notion of a strategic move if Bob Woodward had been the author who writes without fear of offending the subject.After reading the book "Elon Musk" by Walter Isaacson, I am inclined to believe it was a strategic move. He has done this sort of thing before. If he was not satisfied with the performance of the team, or not satisfied with how quickly they were responding to his direction for a drastic change in operation or organization, his method seems to be to tear the whole thing down and rebuild it like he wants it. He was obviously not happy with the way things were going with the Supercharger team.
Long story short, he liked "Total Recall" and not "The Fifth Element"No, it is just a toxic executive who is in a panic because of slightly less than good quarterly results. All he knows to do is layoffs. Tesla would have been fine but he is doing a lot of damage to it now. The fact that we can even consider its financial position when in fact it has a good balance sheet shows just how much harm a bad CEO can cause.
The "Peter" principle applies once again. Seriously, the Robo-Taxi is a bet the company move? I have strong vibes of that time when a company decided to make a small pocket-sized computer with a touch screen and a cellular chip so it could act as a phone. The doubters doubted. The cynics laughed. The engineers worked hard, billions were spent, schedules slipped but they believed and through hard work and sacrifice made the Windows Phone what it is today.
The engineers worked hard, billions were spent, schedules slipped but they believed and through hard work and sacrifice made the Windows Phone what it is today.
"The Walter Isaacson-Kara Swisher Showdown" is an episode from "On", the podcast of long time Silicon Valley reporter Kara Swisher.After reading the book "Elon Musk" by Walter Isaacson, I am inclined to believe it was a strategic move.