Sponsored

This trip question mi/kWh: Average or semi real time?

strahanjen

Active member
First Name
Jennifer
Joined
May 27, 2024
Threads
11
Messages
36
Reaction score
26
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
2024 Ford 150 Lightning Flash
Hi, we’ve had a 2024 Flash since November. I still cannot figure out if the mi/kWh display is an average for the entire trip or a somewhat real time value to reflect changing conditions (city roads vs highway speeds). Sometimes the value fluctuates quite a bit over just a minute or two, and sometimes it holds pretty steady and the changes are in small increments.
Sponsored

 

bmwhitetx

Well-known member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
May 21, 2021
Threads
43
Messages
2,081
Reaction score
2,898
Location
DFW-Texas
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Retired engineer
I believe it is simply the number of miles you have traveled divided by the kWh used (since you pressed start). That's the definition of average.

It can vary a lot early on in the trip but should settle down. It is not an instantaneous number like some ICE vehicles can show.
 

Heliian

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
1,328
Reaction score
1,477
Location
Canada
Vehicles
2023 LR Lariat, code name "Boogaloo"
"this trip". Is your current trip average.

You can use and reset "trip 1" and "trip 2" while driving to get more recent usage.

Check out the energy usage page for more details of where the energy went.

I find it quite handy while driving distances.
 

SpaceEVDriver

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2022
Threads
18
Messages
371
Reaction score
653
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
2023 Lightning Lariat ER, 2022 Mustang Mach-E
As stated, the efficiency is miles driven since starting the truck divided by energy used. If you have lots of hills or lots of starts and stops, the displayed efficiency can change a lot because you might use energy, add some back, etc over a relatively short distance and that changes the average more quickly than you might imagine.

On a similar topic:
The range estimator is not just the current trip's efficiency * battery capacity remaining. It includes a weighted average of something like the efficiency in the last 5-ish minutes, the overall efficiency of the current trip, and your longer-term driving history. If you're using one of the mapping applications that knows what the battery is doing, the app might also include some elevation changes in that weighting.
 

Firn

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2024
Threads
22
Messages
740
Reaction score
858
Location
USA
Vehicles
23 Pro ER
As stated, the efficiency is miles driven since starting the truck divided by energy used. If you have lots of hills or lots of starts and stops, the displayed efficiency can change a lot because you might use energy, add some back, etc over a relatively short distance and that changes the average more quickly than you might imagine.

On a similar topic:
The range estimator is not just the current trip's efficiency * battery capacity remaining. It includes a weighted average of something like the efficiency in the last 5-ish minutes, the overall efficiency of the current trip, and your longer-term driving history. If you're using one of the mapping applications that knows what the battery is doing, the app might also include some elevation changes in that weighting.
I mean, we call it the GOM for a reason, but I think your explanation still gives it too much credit.

For example, I NEVER get over 2.1mi/kwh, yet recently charging to 100% had the GOM showing nearly 340 miles of range. Granted, it is more accurate around 80% SOC.
 

Sponsored

PJnc284

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
293
Reaction score
295
Location
Garner, NC
Vehicles
2023 Ford F150 Lightning Lariat ER
I believe it is simply the number of miles you have traveled divided by the kWh used (since you pressed start). That's the definition of average.

It can vary a lot early on in the trip but should settle down. It is not an instantaneous number like some ICE vehicles can show.
I would guess that's how ABRP calculates it as well but it can be up to .5 higher than what the truck shows. Been meaning to check the kWh before and after a trip in CarScanner and see if it matches either.
 

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
84
Messages
5,396
Reaction score
7,163
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
In short you have to be careful understanding, or even trusting, some of the numbers. My Trip 1 and Trip 2 efficiencies on my Mach-E reset for no reason on a trip, losing my lifetime efficiency forever.

Trip 1, as stated, can jump around at the beginning of a trip, then settles down as more miles pile on.

You have to remember that its' an average, so that you don't get in trouble. If you're on a trip and it's plugging along at 1.8, and then you hit a 20mph headwind, you might be getting 1.2. But the average might slowly drop to 1.7, then 1.6... In the meantime, you're chewing up range without realizing how fast. That's why I use CarScanner. It shows me the ENERGY in the vehicle as well as the instant efficiency. So you notice you're getting say 1.2 despite a 1.7 trip average, and see you have 50kWh left, so you can do the math and say "I've got 60 miles of range left". You'll learn that way faster than the GOM telling you.
 

Firn

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2024
Threads
22
Messages
740
Reaction score
858
Location
USA
Vehicles
23 Pro ER
In short you have to be careful understanding, or even trusting, some of the numbers. My Trip 1 and Trip 2 efficiencies on my Mach-E reset for no reason on a trip, losing my lifetime efficiency forever.

Trip 1, as stated, can jump around at the beginning of a trip, then settles down as more miles pile on.

You have to remember that its' an average, so that you don't get in trouble. If you're on a trip and it's plugging along at 1.8, and then you hit a 20mph headwind, you might be getting 1.2. But the average might slowly drop to 1.7, then 1.6... In the meantime, you're chewing up range without realizing how fast. That's why I use CarScanner. It shows me the ENERGY in the vehicle as well as the instant efficiency. So you notice you're getting say 1.2 despite a 1.7 trip average, and see you have 50kWh left, so you can do the math and say "I've got 60 miles of range left". You'll learn that way faster than the GOM telling you.
@Ford Motor Company , you really need to throw an air speed sensor (with PIDs) in these vehicles. Maybe you don't care since thr e GOM is so worthless anyways, but for those of us who care air speed plays a huge aspect into efficiency.

I have to imagine you have CFD simulations as to how air speed and direction impact efficiency, it needs to be included as it very well may be the difference between making the next charger and getting stranded.
 

SpaceEVDriver

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2022
Threads
18
Messages
371
Reaction score
653
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
2023 Lightning Lariat ER, 2022 Mustang Mach-E
I mean, we call it the GOM for a reason, but I think your explanation still gives it too much credit.

For example, I NEVER get over 2.1mi/kwh, yet recently charging to 100% had the GOM showing nearly 340 miles of range. Granted, it is more accurate around 80% SOC.
Yeah. Agreed.

My summary is of one of the algorithms described by Ford in its patents (and I missed several parameters like ambient and battery temperature). The specific data they incorporate are subject to lots of noise. For example, a 5- or 10-minute running average is likely to be subject to a lot of spikes that result in a poor quality average, which is one reason they blend it with the longer-running averages. But noise can still cause significant deviation from realistic values.

I regularly get over 2.4 miles/kWh on the freeway and my GOM usually bounces between 280 and 320 miles of range at 100% charge. I've never seen it estimate 340 miles at 100% SoC, but I've gone more than 340 miles on a single charge.

/shrug
 

Firn

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2024
Threads
22
Messages
740
Reaction score
858
Location
USA
Vehicles
23 Pro ER
Yeah. Agreed.

My summary is of one of the algorithms described by Ford in its patents (and I missed several parameters like ambient and battery temperature). The specific data they incorporate are subject to lots of noise. For example, a 5- or 10-minute running average is likely to be subject to a lot of spikes that result in a poor quality average, which is one reason they blend it with the longer-running averages. But noise can still cause significant deviation from realistic values.

I regularly get over 2.4 miles/kWh on the freeway and my GOM usually bounces between 280 and 320 miles of range at 100% charge. I've never seen it estimate 340 miles at 100% SoC, but I've gone more than 340 miles on a single charge.

/shrug
Yeah, I'm well versed in multi-variable technical data analysis as that's basically my day job. It's just astounding to me they can be so far off. As you point out, you get roughly EPA testing average efficiency, and your GOM shows EPA mileage or less. And yet I get well below EPA efficiency, yet it shows above EPA mileage.

Probably worse is that they DO show us estimated mileage. That's such a crap shoot since the type of driving you do varies so much. And yet with this fancy digital dash they show us that instead of some meaningful display, chart, or graph we can actually make use out of.

Frankly, it is astounding to me that with all these sensors, this amazing dash display, we get absolutely nothing as for meaningful displays. Heck, go one further and give us an app marketplace where guys can sell displays and apps, I wouldn't even care if Ford took 40% off the top, if I could buy a meaningful display for $5 I absolutely would do so.
Sponsored

 
 







Top