Sponsored

Those after delivery *and* drove an EV before, what's missing or could be improved?

sotek2345

Well-known member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Jun 7, 2021
Threads
30
Messages
3,700
Reaction score
4,360
Location
Upstate NY
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat ER, 2021 Mach-e GT
Occupation
Engineering Manager
If I needed a dog mode, I’d just leave the truck “running” and lock it with the fob inside. Re-enter via door code.
Note: Mach-e has a 30 minute time out on this, though I think you can change that in settings.
Sponsored

 

Maquis

Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
May 20, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
3,587
Reaction score
4,549
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
2021 Mach-E E4-X; 2023 Lightning Lariat ER

adoublee

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Threads
12
Messages
749
Reaction score
689
Location
Midwest
Vehicles
2 EVs
Battery SOC percentage ALWAYS on in a common location. It's more important than GOM miles once you've driven EV a while.

Miles/kWh to X.XX precision! More precision needed with battery that is 3-4X that of a Nisssn Leaf. When towing the difference between 0.81 and 0.89 miles per kWh is 10.5 miles (dont know if they round at 8.5). That is significant when towing only gets 105-120 miles.
 

ilkhan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
81
Reaction score
14
Location
Iowa
Vehicles
2012 Ford Escape Limted
Oh boy here we go! I am 8 days in and I wanted to love the truck. I've been waiting for an EV F150 for a decade (ever since the DOA Toyota/Ford hybrid was announced). The wife and I are not fully in love with it. We really like it, but it's stupid little things getting us, which is frustrating because they are so fixable in software. Mine are (some are repeat).

1) Dog mode. This is a killer. We travel a lot and the dogs come EVERYWHERE. We picked the truck up and drove about 120 miles north to a family birthday dinner. We tested and saw remote start left climate on, leaving us to think "awesome we can make our own dog mode". I figured I could keep extending the remote start by 15 minutes. Welp at dinner I learn you can only extend it once. Okay fine I'll just turn the car off and on again from the app. NOPE you have to go to the car, start it, and then it lets you reset. So a 2 hour dinner had me setting a timer, having it go off every 28 minutes and going out to cycle the car. Each time disturbing the dogs who had settled down. This put a huge damper on day one excitement. We also thought it was a given we could monitor temps from the app; nope. So the whole time we were worried if it was on or not. Losing Dog Mode is almost enough justification to sell the truck. We didn't realize how much we rely on it, but we live and breath by it. Just today, she is out of town and I couldn't take the truck because I had client meetings and was going to be away from home much of the day. I needed dog mode and took the Tesla. With it being 100 degrees, knowing it would alert me if it failed, or that I could check the temp every 5 minutes was a huge relief.

2) The Navigation. This has me very irritated daily, especially in stressful driving situations. I never had a car, or drove a car, with any good navigation UI, and I have been in many cars, besides the Tesla. I was so pumped when Android Auto/CarPlay came out. Well we had a Jeep Gladiator from May '20 - Nov '21 and really disliked both Android Auto/CarPlay (mixed OS household). We thought it was Jeep adding extra nannies and having poor USB connections. Well now in the F150L I learned how much I prefer the Tesla OS to AA/CP. It's just so fluid and fast to boot. There's a weird delay in AA that has me missing turns (turns are very close in Boston area); it's weird and cannot explain it but it (Google Maps or Waze) lag a fraction of a second that messes me up. Also the boot up time is long. But more than anything, the inability to type in an address.

Day 2 of having the truck. My wife calls me and we plan on me picking up dinner, I need to change the address. I go to type it into Waze, but I'm locked out. I go to use built in Nav, I'm locked out. I have to then hang up on her, try voice commands and they don't work. Then I try voice commands on AA and it works. Then I call the wife back. It was so frustrating and much less safe than me quickly typing a few letters in the Tesla; I was so distracted for a good 2 minutes.

On top of all that, the Ford voice prompts suck. I am at about 30% success.Tesla is about 95% success. AA is better, but I prefer the built in. So any time my plan changes, I gotta pull over to type in the address; how is that safer when on a highway!

3) Boot up: In the Tesla, as I am walking out the door, I click the address and send it the Tesla (takes 10 seconds). I unplug the car, get in, put my phone on the wireless charger, and drive. It's booted up immediately, has my address, and Spotify is picked up and playing where I left it off; 15 seconds and I'm on the road. In the truck, I unplug, get in, hit the start button, wait 10-20 seconds, enter the address, wait for Android auto, plug in my phone, realize I forgot to close the charge port, get out, close it, get in, and go. It's so many more steps and most have been eliminated in the Tesla. Again I had no idea how good I had it with the Tesla UI/Nav/integrated music.

4) Manual Charge Door: I feel like I'm breaking it with how hard you have to push to open. Then on top of that, I have forgotten to close it every single time. I am sure I will get better with this, but it's just something I am not used to at all.

5) Start Button: I mentioned it above BUT WHY IS THERE A START BUTTON. First time I drove a Model 3 I was so confused, but after that, it just made sense. It's so silly to need a start button in an EV.

6) Cabin overheat protection: I didn't realize how nice it was to have a cabin that is never over 100 degrees getting into it. Coffee is never melted after 5 minutes, waters still drinkable, etc.

7) The Data: Everything that was said earlier about the charge data. It's crazy how limited your data is and how important that is. Why limit it?! And not being able to set the amps per charge is a giant miss. I still have been unable to find where to set the charge to 90 from 100, except the one time override (this is me being dumb probably and not researching).

8) The instrument cluster. I was excited to have one again after the 3, but it is very limited. I would have hoped for a lot more efficiency data, configurability, or maps. I assumed I would see the GPS overlay there like Audi does (most of my experience with digital dash). It's not bad, but I just thought there would be more.

9)BlueCruise. I love it except the nags have me not using it :). The eye tracking is a good idea, but with sunglasses, it beeps at me at all the time. If I got to change my seat temp, beep. Change the volume, beep. Even many times looking fully ahead it beeps and only way I can avoid the harsh brake warning is to take them off. Without sunglasses, no issue, but I almost always drive with them during the day. I feel on the highway it is more stable than Tesla AP, but the nags are killer.

Also, when is it on?! It seems there are no real tones and very minor visual details to tell you it's on and what mode it is in. I am not sure, but I think there are 3 modes: 1) Basic ACC/Lane Keep 2)BlueCruise not hands free 3) BlueCruise hands free. After 700 miles, I still am not sure if that 3 mode assumption is right and can never realize, without looking at the tiny icon, what mode I am in. Tesla has one mode - AP (ignoring all the FSD BS).

10) The App. If you are coming from Tesla, just assume there is no app. The features are minimal (no HVAC, no temp, no ability to change chargin settings, no radio control) and the features it has are so slow to load. You open the location and most times it's out of date and hasn't loaded a recent location. I was walking the dogs and thought cool, I can turn Zone Lighting on the see better in the yard. Well that takes 15-20 seconds to load, then once it does, another 15-20 to turn on. Just an incredibly poor app, horribly slow, and leaps and bounds behind Tesla even when I got it in 2018.

11) DahsCam: I've had dashcams for some time and when Tesla integrated them, it was a great feature add! Recording wasn't as good as a dedicated one, but it hit all the main points and gave a great 360 view. I miss having that and didn't even think about needing to buy and install one now; it's been a given for years now.

12) Charging: Small note, but a 131 kWh battery is Huge! I knew, but didn't fully realize the impact. I'm on the mobile charger right now, that's about 18 hours to fully charge! One night we got home with range around 20% and the next day I left and it was only at 65% range after a full night's sleep. It wasnt an issue, but just very surprising as I had not done the math out.

13) DCFC: I had thought the networks were better than what is being said, and did a big post on this earlier on. The chargers are so much fewer, and I am not sure why this isn't a giant talking point, but they seem to average 4 stalls! That's so few, most Tesla SC are a minimum of 8. We have only had to DCFC once, and it was a great comparison as the EA charger was in the same lot as the Tesla SC we frequent. Man did the experience leave a lot to be desired. I didn't realize we had to think about parking orientation. Tesla SC are easy, back in and you are good. I had to remember where the port was and park the right way. Easy enough to do, but just something I didn't realize. Then when I parked realized station was down. Okay there are 4 stalls and all are open. We go to the next stall. Well that one was broken too. We go to the 3rd and it works! Plug and Charge gets a lot of fan fare, and maybe it is better than our experience, but it took ~2 minute to start; it was like booting up a computer with a HDD vs SSD, spinning that felt like it was never gonna stop. So our experience probably 50+ times of using the SC in the same lot was magnitudes better than the EA station. It took about 6/7 minutes to start charging between finding a working stall and waiting for it to finally go. Maybe this was a fluke, but from the experiences we are hearing about, this sounds normal. It feels like a giant step backwards.

14) Charge Speeds: I knew 150 kWh on a big battery was going to be slower, but man. We ran into WalMart and did a little shopping. We charged for 24 minutes and had gained about 40%. In the same time on a Tesla V3 we get about 75-80% and about 70% on a v2. Charge stops are now going to be charge stops we lose time to. With the Tesla, charge stops are usually perfectly timed breaks and 80%+ of the time, car is done before us.

15) Range: From the Mach-e efficiency tests, we were hopeful to get 80% of rated in mild weather, worse in the winter, and better in the summer. We hoped to get a real 280 miles out of it based on past Ford EVs. Well, we are getting 260 miles real range (from 100% to 0%) in the summer. I am nervous what winter will bring. Again, expected with an EV, and what we get in the Tesla, but I just had higher hopes based on Mach-es.

16) Wireless Charging. Huge hardware miss. In an hour drive, I get a few % at most. It must be 5w wireless charging, which is an incredibly old standard and overheats phones fast, with virtually no charge; it is a maintainer at best. And why only one phone slot? There is plenty of space for dual wireless chargers. I never realized how smart Tesla's setup is. My Model 3 has the older console and had a wired charger, but the aftermarket (and later factory) dual wireless charges are much faster. I looked online for aftermarket, but no good solutions.

17) Guess-o-meter(GOM): I often wondered why Tesla did not adjust it's GOM on the fly. I always hoped they would let you out your own efficiency in and have it recalulate to that. Ford's automatically recalulates on the fly. And of the 3 ways to do a GOM (Static/Change parameters manually/Change parameters real time) is this by far the worse. You start a trip based on your last trip. Is it 30 degrees colder today? Are you driving all highway today and yesterday was all city? I have had days it start at 280 miles, 230 miles, and many more random numbers. It is completely meaningless as every day is a different drive with different variables. At least with a static GOM, you can learn the efficiency and mentally calculate. The numbers always changing on the fly kill any planning I typically do in an EV.

Okay fine, ignore the GOM then, just use % you say. We guess what? It is about 3/4 taps down on the center screen or shows on the IC if you are in Calm Mode/BC only. Ford assumes the always changing and temperamental GOM is what you should listen to and shows it 100% of the time, where % is hidden a majority of the time. Tesla lets you pick either and quickly swap by tapping it. Give me that, or at least show both at all times.

Overall, this sounds like a scathing review. It's not! We love the truck and think it is amazing at being an EV F-150. But if you look at it from the lens of an experienced EV (Tesla) owner, it feels very behind the game in many areas. Honestly, almost all of these gripes (minus charging) are pretty straightforward software fixes in the future. I will say though, I was 15/10 excited for this truck and am 6/10 happy with it. I had fully written off the Cybertruck as Tesla BS that will be plagued with issues, and just look at how ugly it is. That being said, I am now more excited for the CT as the software and UI of the F150L really is half a decade behind Tesla. There is not a single "EV" thing it does better. Truck things, oh heck yes! And features, love the cooled seats, love the 360 cameras, power frunk is amazing! And countless more great features.

If you are looking at the F150L through the lens of an ICE owner, especially a F150 owner, this is an amazing vehicle and you will love it. The interface and features are leaps and bounds above any non-EV I have driven. And I think that is what Ford was benchmarking for, and crushed.


Hope this helps!
Someone put this post in front of the lightning product manager and just say "fix every one of these gripes, now". It's almost all software and all legit stumbling blocks.
 

ChrisCon

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Threads
31
Messages
500
Reaction score
900
Location
The Hamptons, NY
Vehicles
'22 Carbonized Grey Lightning Lariat ER
On coming to a complete stop or starting off on certain angles it will roll back ever so slightly - like driving a manual. .
At my business we have a gravel parking lot that goes up slightly to a concrete curtain that goes down slightly. to the road, the truck will roll back and then inch forth 8-10" multiple times if I'm "stopped" and about to pull out.
 

Sponsored

tls

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2022
Threads
19
Messages
419
Reaction score
391
Location
New York
Vehicles
2022 Lightning
I owned a 2015 Model S and still own a 2020 Model Y, both bought new. I have a close friend who traded up from a CMax to a Model 3, and my sister overseas has used a Kia Soul EV as her daily driver for several years. I have had almost every configuration of Tesla vehicle except the Roadster and the Plaids as a service loaner or insurance rental and I've had Leafs and Bolts as rentals while traveling for work. I drive a lot of EVs.

My work vehicle for the past 2 years has been a 2020 STX so I am reasonably comfortable with the F150 platform.

The F150L is a superb truck. In one-pedal mode the resemblance of the driving dynamics to the Model X is uncanny despite the considerably lower complexity of the Ford suspension. It is a tremendous engineering triumph for Ford. It does so many things well that the weaknesses do stand out.

The most glaring weakness is the FordPass app and the most glaring weakness in the app is the charging-related functionality. I have 3 jobs (sigh) but my bread and butter for 30 years has been software and I have done my share of embedded software. Ford (or most likely a contractor - I could guess who but I won't) clearly put the "B" team or worse on the app, judging it much less important than the basic functionality of the truck itself. They cut too many corners here. The app is laughably poorly implemented and tested - I mean, come *on*, it mixes up AM and PM, any competent test plan would have caught that before it shipped - but it also shows the telltale signs of poor design. Its product manager and architect (if it even had one) were inexperienced or just bad at their jobs. Ford should throw away 90% of the functionality in the existing app - or just release a parallel new app - and replace it with one modeled on Tesla's. If they want to innovate from there, fine, but first get some competent people involved and tell them they may not create a single new feature unless the app is verified to have exactly and only the charging and vehicle-control functionality of the Tesla app. No opportunity to be artist and paint the Mona Lisa until you can show me you can draw a straight line. It is very basic. Who the heck cares if you can browse and save past charging locations? Let me see the charge rate *now* so I can enjoy my lunch and dinner on my 1000 mile drive peacefully without worrying that the balky 3rd party DCFC has stopped charging my truck. Let me set the charge target *now*, not next time I visit this same location. Etc. Oh, and talk to the firmware people for the truck, fix the API or your use of it so when the user asks for data you would need to wake up the truck to gather, you just do so instead of making excuses - and fix all the ridiculous app hangs and crashes or else go get another job and stay away from anything that says "Ford" on it or that I might ever have to use.

The underperformance of the app development team is jeopardizing the payoff from all the hard work everyone else at Ford did on the truck. That is a shame. Ford management needs to wake up quick and fix it, particularly because it is a thing they *can* fix without having to source 100,000 piece lots of embedded CPUs or DACs etc. Wake up, do some management, tell the FordPass team to dramatically improve their product or show them the door and replace them. The first fully functional 3rd party app for the original Model S was written by a single (highly experienced) developer in his spare time over the course of one month. Just quit making excuses and fix this.

Aside from that: I'd like a standard 6.5' box, I still cannot seem to learn to load the short box though all my stuff really ought to fit. And who on earth thought it made sense to do a power frunk, power tailgate, and power mirrors but not a power charge door?
 

Nate977p

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
115
Reaction score
151
Location
Boston
Vehicles
Tesla Model 3 Performance
I didn't intend for this to become a gripe approach, which is why I asked what was missing rather than what's wrong - but feedback is a gift and hopefully accepted.
Exactly. Normally I am not a negative Nancy, and is it refreshing to not be in a Tesla forum. I thought I was going to get flamed out by posting something like this! Over there I would be called a liar, short seller, and a whole other list of things for valid complaints...

And that's the funny part here, I don't think anything I said, except power charge port door, wireless charger, and range disappoint can't be fixed in software. And range disappointment was me getting my hopes up, but objectively, its right in line with what I thought it would be, but not what I hoped :).

I think my post was pretty much all missing things that can be easily rectified and really helpful in transitioning to Ford EVs.

And boy do I hope they listen because in my opinion, Ford can be a very close #2 to Tesla, they just need to figure out how to break from their "legacy" mindset for software. The hardware is good (except 5w wireless charging, that's some giant, steaming, horsepoop).
 

Nate977p

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
115
Reaction score
151
Location
Boston
Vehicles
Tesla Model 3 Performance
This is exacerbated by the mobile charge connector being limited to 30A. It's interesting they give you a powerful, 80A hardwired charge connector but not a 40A mobile charge connector. Tesla is similarly limited to 32A these days, but on a 100 kWh battery max.

And just to echo the gripes above, would be great to (a) be able to select a current limitation and (b) see the rate you're charging at. I'd also like to be able to set a default charge limitation (e.g., 90%) rather than having to set a limit on a per-location basis.

Others for the list:
  • I get that it's a truck and truck buyers historically want a shifter, and not saying they should go to the Tesla system of guessing which direction you want to go, but I can't get behind a purely drive-by-wire shifter that takes up half the console. Maybe go with the Lincoln PRDL push buttons as a happy medium.
  • May just be me, but the proximity key seems to require you to be inches from the door to unlock. Which is weird given the lights come on when you're 15 feet away, so clearly the vehicle knows you're there.
  • Why limit us to three user profiles linked to memory buttons on the door? Seems like with phone as a key, it would be more convenient to link to the driver's phone (like Teslas do).
  • Frunk is slow, but so is the tailgate on the way up.
  • Truck seems to love defaulting to enabling driver-focused HVAC setting - how about turning on/off in the back automatically based on seatbelt usage (like I believe our Model X does)?
Yeah exactly. Speed makes sense and should not be an issue, but it's weird in real life to have a 240v not charge overnight.

I get not putting a bigger charger in because it only benefits a tiny subset of people and I assume this is shared with the Mach-E? Also on the charger, I loved how much the copied Tesla in design and style; it's nearly identical in execution (how the heads work, design of body, etc,) except about 5p% bigger. But then I laughed that they cheaped out on the Logo on the carrying bag. Bag is much cheaper feeling too.

I also thought the same on the 3 presets. Not an issue for us, but I hope they give more for those who will benefit from it. I see a lot of complaints on slow frunk, and it is, but I adjusted for that quickly by pressing it earlier than you would think to.

On the keys, I do wish they did the credit card style keys. I hated the idea at first, and love it now. I don't carry any keys and not excited to go back to keys :(
 

Nate977p

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
115
Reaction score
151
Location
Boston
Vehicles
Tesla Model 3 Performance
I drove a Model 3 for 4 years and still have another in the garage. So I definitely think Ford should have been able to at least copy the good features from Tesla, but they haven't. I think all of my issues have been listed above, I'll capture though for what bugs me the most.

1 - Lack of motor control at slow speeds or shifting F to R and vice versa. There should be no roll, there should be no slack but there is. I think this is what Kyle from OOS noted in his test drives. It's just sloppy.

2 - The app and charging. It is the most unintuitive way to set your charging limit ever. In fact you have to charge once at any address it looks like to be able to set the limit at that address for future chargers. Why?

3 - Navigation voice feedback is way too wordy and so far likely only correct 40% of the time - the Tesla rarely missed it. It is taking a step backwards.

4- Start/Stop button - personally I hate this and didn't see a need - it doesn't make sense for those that use this as a daily driver and commuter family vehicle. However, I'll go on record as saying I get it now. For those that use the truck for work. Those that might be in and out of the truck but not need to go anywhere - a job site for example. You don't need the AC firing up every time. You don't need it to power up to drive at times. For those folks I get it. For my use - it is a big waste. The truck could be more intuitive.

5 - PRND shifter. The stalk on a Tesla is easier and makes more sense. I don't want a dial, but the old traditional shifter Ford left behind is clunky.

6- COHP - Cabin Overheat Protection - just do it already. Way too simple and needed in the heat.

7 - The GUI. - way over complicated. Narrow it down. Controls and Settings. The dash could be way more customizable.

8 - Edit to add - Bluecruise is dangerous as hell dis-engaging without more of a warning. You get a flash on the screen, but there has to be more of an alert than that you need to take over your truck just quit steering for you. This will make you scratch your head.

9 - Edit to add - this deserves its own thread to see how to improve, but for this price point the stereo sucks. Paying for a name like B&O to have something like this in the Lightning is kind of embarrassing. Those that drive a Tesla - 3 and Y and later S will understand this.

I'll acknowledge that Tesla has evolved, the app wasn't near what it is today on day 1, but Ford has had time to cheat and copy and they haven't. Their thought process to make things happen is clunk. Tesla takes it to the extreme to need so little interaction so maybe a middle ground, but Ford could have at least copied the good parts.
Those are other great points!

3) WHY DOES IT TELL ME "United States of America & zip code". It's not an issue just way overkill.

4) I'll agree again! They could kill it's need in software, but won't.

7) Yup. I have gotten used to it and do love options though so it's fun to me now. Just wish some important things were higher up.

8) Thank you! I thought it was me. I never know when I'm on it right and which of the 3 modes it's in. I like that I can override without the violent jerk of Autopilot, but not at the expense of the safety. Also, I have almost driven into other cars several times now when I change lanes.

With Tesla, you hit the stalk and it goes. I get BlueCruise can't do that, but I would not expect it to turn off when you signal, such a different mental shift from the Tesla.


On the hardware items (and yes these are gripes):

5) Give me dual fast wireless charging! My 2011 F150 had a bench and I would such much more prefer a bench (I know luxury trucks lose that). I will say it's "commanding" but a giant waste of space, give me a column shifter!

9) Yeah, the system is garbage for an upgraded system, it would be a good base system. There I admitted it to myself and said it out loud. I am a (retired) audiophile and put some great systems in past cars. My upgraded A4 stereo was okay and not worth the time/$$$ to upgrade and the Tesla has a kickass system. The F150L B&O is a very bad "upgraded" system and sounds much worse than our upgraded system on the Gladiator. I had no desire to upgrade, but if we keep it, that may be on the list :( I don't regret not going Platinum, as I can do a lot better for less $, but a disappointment for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GDN

Nate977p

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
115
Reaction score
151
Location
Boston
Vehicles
Tesla Model 3 Performance
That’s if you take the fob with you. I think.
Here‘s a big discussion on all the nuances of leaving the AC on.
https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/keeping-the-a-c-on.19821/page-2
Yes and we are going to have to learn those settings, and for safety buy a Waggle temp sensor.

Can it be done? Yes. But totally different. One is a set of settings you have to remember and you have 0 ability to check on it. The other is one button, leaves a message on screen, alerts you if it fails, and allows for spot checks easily of both it being on and the actual car temp. It's a huge piece of mind for us.
 

Sponsored

Nate977p

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
115
Reaction score
151
Location
Boston
Vehicles
Tesla Model 3 Performance
I owned a 2015 Model S and still own a 2020 Model Y, both bought new. I have a close friend who traded up from a CMax to a Model 3, and my sister overseas has used a Kia Soul EV as her daily driver for several years. I have had almost every configuration of Tesla vehicle except the Roadster and the Plaids as a service loaner or insurance rental and I've had Leafs and Bolts as rentals while traveling for work. I drive a lot of EVs.

My work vehicle for the past 2 years has been a 2020 STX so I am reasonably comfortable with the F150 platform.

The F150L is a superb truck. In one-pedal mode the resemblance of the driving dynamics to the Model X is uncanny despite the considerably lower complexity of the Ford suspension. It is a tremendous engineering triumph for Ford. It does so many things well that the weaknesses do stand out.

The most glaring weakness is the FordPass app and the most glaring weakness in the app is the charging-related functionality. I have 3 jobs (sigh) but my bread and butter for 30 years has been software and I have done my share of embedded software. Ford (or most likely a contractor - I could guess who but I won't) clearly put the "B" team or worse on the app, judging it much less important than the basic functionality of the truck itself. They cut too many corners here. The app is laughably poorly implemented and tested - I mean, come *on*, it mixes up AM and PM, any competent test plan would have caught that before it shipped - but it also shows the telltale signs of poor design. Its product manager and architect (if it even had one) were inexperienced or just bad at their jobs. Ford should throw away 90% of the functionality in the existing app - or just release a parallel new app - and replace it with one modeled on Tesla's. If they want to innovate from there, fine, but first get some competent people involved and tell them they may not create a single new feature unless the app is verified to have exactly and only the charging and vehicle-control functionality of the Tesla app. No opportunity to be artist and paint the Mona Lisa until you can show me you can draw a straight line. It is very basic. Who the heck cares if you can browse and save past charging locations? Let me see the charge rate *now* so I can enjoy my lunch and dinner on my 1000 mile drive peacefully without worrying that the balky 3rd party DCFC has stopped charging my truck. Let me set the charge target *now*, not next time I visit this same location. Etc. Oh, and talk to the firmware people for the truck, fix the API or your use of it so when the user asks for data you would need to wake up the truck to gather, you just do so instead of making excuses - and fix all the ridiculous app hangs and crashes or else go get another job and stay away from anything that says "Ford" on it or that I might ever have to use.

The underperformance of the app development team is jeopardizing the payoff from all the hard work everyone else at Ford did on the truck. That is a shame. Ford management needs to wake up quick and fix it, particularly because it is a thing they *can* fix without having to source 100,000 piece lots of embedded CPUs or DACs etc. Wake up, do some management, tell the FordPass team to dramatically improve their product or show them the door and replace them. The first fully functional 3rd party app for the original Model S was written by a single (highly experienced) developer in his spare time over the course of one month. Just quit making excuses and fix this.

Aside from that: I'd like a standard 6.5' box, I still cannot seem to learn to load the short box though all my stuff really ought to fit. And who on earth thought it made sense to do a power frunk, power tailgate, and power mirrors but not a power charge door?
Awesome points. I have to agree. Hardware wise, some things I would like different (or could have paid more for in the radio), but man is it a tremendously engineered vehicle. And I said it before, but think it's worth saying again. It's an amazing value all things considered. Very little comes close to it in value, and that's saying a lot. I love the Model 3, but when I bought it, the total objective value wasn't there like it is with the F150L.

I think that's why I'm so conflicted. It's everything I wanted in all the parts that are hard to do. But in the easy parts, it fails in many places and they are very easy (relative to the hardware) fixes!

It's like a great steak dinner where the steak is amazing but they never refill your water (and I love water at dinner!)
 
Last edited:

GDN

Well-known member
First Name
Greg
Joined
Feb 15, 2022
Threads
84
Messages
3,235
Reaction score
3,958
Location
Dallas, TX
Vehicles
Lightning Lariat ER, Performance Y
Occupation
IT
Awesome points. I have to agree. Hardware wise, some things I would like different (or could have paid more for in the radio), but man is it a tremendously engineered vehicle. And I said it before, but think it's worth saying again. It's an amazing value all things considered. Very little comes close to it in value, and that's saying a lot. I love the Model 3, but when I bought it, the total objective value wasn't there like it is with the F150L.

I think that's why I'm so conflicted. It's everything I wanted in all the parts that are hard to do. But in the easy parts, it fails very miserably and they are very easy (relative to the hardware) fixes!

It's like a great steak dinner where the steak is amazing but they never refill your water!
I agree with you 1000%. I am hopeful they will update software and innovate a little or just copy the glaring omissions.

I have a slight concern if they truly move to a different OS and perhaps hardware for 2023. It has been noted they are moving to Android OS. I'm not a fan of that, but even less of a fan that we might truly just get left behind as the first year elephant.

If they make this move I can't imagine they wouldn't offer some sort of retro upgrade for us, but I just don't know if Fords engineering could have been thoughtful and good enough to make it backwards compatible with the 2022.
 

Nate977p

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
115
Reaction score
151
Location
Boston
Vehicles
Tesla Model 3 Performance
I agree with you 1000%. I am hopeful they will update software and innovate a little or just copy the glaring omissions.

I have a slight concern if they truly move to a different OS and perhaps hardware for 2023. It has been noted they are moving to Android OS. I'm not a fan of that, but even less of a fan that we might truly just get left behind as the first year elephant.

If they make this move I can't imagine they wouldn't offer some sort of retro upgrade for us, but I just don't know if Fords engineering could have been thoughtful and good enough to make it backwards compatible with the 2022.
Ohh.....

Don't scare me like this! If there are only ever 15-20k trucks with this setup, yeah they ain't gonna care about us like the new ones and fix it all in the new system....
 
  • Like
Reactions: GDN

ExCivilian

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
647
Reaction score
433
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
'05 RAM 2500 5.9L Cummins; '22 Lariat ER
If there are only ever 15-20k trucks with this setup, yeah they ain't gonna care about us like the new ones and fix it all in the new system....
Here are the vehicles listed to receive Sync 4:
  • Expedition 2022
  • F-150 Lightning 2022
  • Bronco 2021 - 2022
  • F-150 2021 - 2022
and these will be receiving Sync 4a:
  • Expedition 2022
  • F-150 Lightning 2022
  • Mustang Mach-E 2021 - 2022
  • Edge 2021 - 2022
 

beatle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 1, 2021
Threads
23
Messages
885
Reaction score
995
Location
Springfield, VA
Vehicles
Model S, Ridgeline, Miata, motorcycle(s)
While there's hope since many of these issues/improvements can be fixed with software, has Ford actually made updates to the software since the MME launched over a year ago? If not, it seems like foreshadowing of stagnation at a very early part of the vehicle's lifecycle.
Sponsored

 
  • Like
Reactions: GDN
 





Top