Sponsored

Charger reports 9.6 kW but Lightning reports 8 kW. Why?

Alan Rovner

Member
First Name
Alan
Joined
Jun 10, 2023
Threads
8
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
Location
Vancouver, WA
Vehicles
2023 F150 Lightning XLT
Hi all, this is my first post to the forum. I have a standard range 2023 F150 Lightning XLT and an Emporia charger. The charger is a 40 Amp 9.6 kW charger. When charging the Lightning, the Emporia app shows a charging rate of 9.6 kW and it's very consistent. The Ford Pass app shows a charging rate of 8 kW.

Why is there a difference? Where did the missing 1.6 kW go? Is the Lightning limited to 8 kW? Thanks for any info.

Regards,
Alan Rovner, K7AR
Vancouver, Wash.
Sponsored

 

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
79
Messages
4,928
Reaction score
6,484
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
Two reasons.

1) There is a loss from wall to truck. Assume 8%. So 8.8.

2) Ford app truncated decimal place. 8.8 becomes 8. You can prove this by math. Charge for say 2 hours exactly. Fird app will show kWh added. Will be more than 16.
 

vvgogh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 16, 2023
Threads
18
Messages
78
Reaction score
52
Location
Colorado
Vehicles
'23 F-150 Lightning ER
The floor rounding they use makes the charger look very inefficient. Great software.
 

vandy1981

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
62
Messages
1,509
Reaction score
2,474
Location
Tennessee
Vehicles
'19 Jaguar I-Pace, '22 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Plumber
I see 10-14% loss with level 2 charging depending on ambient temps, so this about what I would expect.
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

Alan Rovner

Member
First Name
Alan
Joined
Jun 10, 2023
Threads
8
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
Location
Vancouver, WA
Vehicles
2023 F150 Lightning XLT
Thank you guys, I didn't realize there was that much loss involved. Looks like things are working normally.

Regards,
Alan Rovner
 

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
79
Messages
4,928
Reaction score
6,484
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
Thank you guys, I didn't realize there was that much loss involved. Looks like things are working normally.

Regards,
Alan Rovner
As I noted, it is loss AND truncation. Loss alone would result in a decimal place, and the app never displays it. You can hookup an OBD reader and see exactly what the truck is getting, then look at the app and see the discrepancy.

Or, you charge for a period of time, then do the math and see that total kWh added doesn't match the rate x time.
 

chl

Well-known member
First Name
CHRIS
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Threads
6
Messages
770
Reaction score
409
Location
alexandria virginia
Vehicles
2001 FORD RANGER, 2023 F-150 LIGHTNING
Hi all, this is my first post to the forum. I have a standard range 2023 F150 Lightning XLT and an Emporia charger. The charger is a 40 Amp 9.6 kW charger. When charging the Lightning, the Emporia app shows a charging rate of 9.6 kW and it's very consistent. The Ford Pass app shows a charging rate of 8 kW.

Why is there a difference? Where did the missing 1.6 kW go? Is the Lightning limited to 8 kW? Thanks for any info.

Regards,
Alan Rovner, K7AR
Vancouver, Wash.
L2 charging losses are typically between 10% and 25% depending.

So the Emporia is providing the 9.6kW of power, but the Lightning battery is only receiving the 8kW Ford Pass app says.

Losses include the wire (resistance loss), the AC-to-DC converter (heat loss - typically between 75 and 95 percent efficient), and the battery itself (it heats up during charging, chemical reactions, and heat is energy lost).

Explained at for example: https://go-e.com/en/magazine/ev-charging-losses
 

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
79
Messages
4,928
Reaction score
6,484
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
L2 charging losses are typically between 10% and 25% depending.

So the Emporia is providing the 9.6kW of power, but the Lightning battery is only receiving the 8kW Ford Pass app says.

Losses include the wire (resistance loss), the AC-to-DC converter (heat loss - typically between 75 and 95 percent efficient), and the battery itself (it heats up during charging, chemical reactions, and heat is energy lost).

Explained at for example: https://go-e.com/en/magazine/ev-charging-losses
As I have stated a few times, a good portion of the difference is the "loss" of the decimal point number.

Again, it's simple math. You can either do the math, or you can use an OBD reader and car scanner to see exactly what the car is receiving.

My charger puts out 11.5kW of energy. My car receives ~10.5. The FordPass app shows 10. It's not 10, it's 10.5. You can see the total energy after exactly say 30 minutes, or 1 hour, doesn't add up to the amount added. It will show say 21 added in 2 hours, when the app is showing a rate of 10. 10x2 = 20. 10.5x2 = 21. Easy to see.
 

Heliian

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Canada
Vehicles
2023 LR Lariat, code name "Boogaloo"
depending on ambient temps
This is a key factor. The charging system will use power to heat or cool the battery and components. Line losses are minimal.

Also, the app is absolutely terrible as far as accuracy and stability.
 

Sponsored

vandy1981

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
62
Messages
1,509
Reaction score
2,474
Location
Tennessee
Vehicles
'19 Jaguar I-Pace, '22 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Plumber
This is a key factor. The charging system will use power to heat or cool the battery and components. Line losses are minimal.

Also, the app is absolutely terrible as far as accuracy and stability.
I think there's also quite a bit of loss with the AC to DC converter. Efficiency losses with DCFC are around 5-6%, although some of this difference could be explained by shorter charging times (i.e. less time spend conditioning the battery).
 

carys98

Well-known member
First Name
Cary
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
595
Reaction score
865
Location
Raleigh, NC
Vehicles
2023 Lightning Lariat SR
In addition, some of the power is used to run the coolant pump and the compressor and fans to maintain the battery temp.
 

chl

Well-known member
First Name
CHRIS
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Threads
6
Messages
770
Reaction score
409
Location
alexandria virginia
Vehicles
2001 FORD RANGER, 2023 F-150 LIGHTNING
As I have stated a few times, a good portion of the difference is the "loss" of the decimal point number.

Again, it's simple math. You can either do the math, or you can use an OBD reader and car scanner to see exactly what the car is receiving.

My charger puts out 11.5kW of energy. My car receives ~10.5. The FordPass app shows 10. It's not 10, it's 10.5. You can see the total energy after exactly say 30 minutes, or 1 hour, doesn't add up to the amount added. It will show say 21 added in 2 hours, when the app is showing a rate of 10. 10x2 = 20. 10.5x2 = 21. Easy to see.
Yes that would account for about 1/2 the apparent loss.
Odd they drop the decimal in the app.
 

Pioneer74

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2021
Threads
32
Messages
3,448
Reaction score
6,149
Location
Dearborn
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat ER - 2022 Mach-E Premium
Occupation
Electrician
This is how bad this app is.

Ford F-150 Lightning Charger reports 9.6 kW but Lightning reports 8 kW.  Why? Screenshot_20230619_230848_Emporia Energy


Ford F-150 Lightning Charger reports 9.6 kW but Lightning reports 8 kW.  Why? Screenshot_20230619_230838_FordPass
 

Zprime29

Well-known member
First Name
Brandon
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Threads
37
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
2,030
Location
Tucson, AZ
Vehicles
Honda Pilot, 2022 Lightning ER
Is it worth even day dreaming that Ford will improve this? *sigh*
Sponsored

 
 





Top