Pioneer74
Well-known member
And a premium price.From what I have read, the T3 will be a new full sized truck with better range than the lightning
Sponsored
And a premium price.From what I have read, the T3 will be a new full sized truck with better range than the lightning
Tennessee should consider that when they vote Red or Blue. The R party has other priorities now.Cuz like half of west Tennessee is counting on that to bring back their economy and growth.
Yes, it is happening.With that be at the TN blue Oval City? Cuz like half of west Tennessee is counting on that to bring back their economy and growth.
That’s a lost cause. They are so steeped in the new version of the R party that they can’t see how they are hurting themselves short or long term.Tennessee should consider that when they vote Red or Blue. The R party has other priorities now.
If the T3 is "mid-sized" and they drop the Lightning, that would be a shame. I love the space in both the Frunk and backseat of my Lightning. Also the bed, and the 10,000 towing capacity.My gut feeling is that the Lightning - as we know it - will not get NACS. There's really not a good reason for Ford to spend the money on it. In the coming months Ford will catch up with adapter production and OEM adapters will be readily available for purchase. If you think about it, most chargers are J1172/CCS. If Ford converted the truck to NACS you'd need to use an adapter more often.
As far as production of the truck, Ford isn't going to leave a gap. They will have a full-size EV truck available for purchase. They'll keep the current generation Lightning running until T3 is here. I suspect they will drop the F150 based Lightning then. It doesn't make financial sense to produce both.
Sorry, yes a 27 model but my thought was the mid year release like they did with the OG Mustang or the “2005” F-150 refresh.T3 will be in 2027.
Shareholders (the ones with the power to do anything) don't care about long term growth. Only short term gains for their portfolios. A reasonable leader with a vision like Farley is a liability to them. I would not be surprised at all if he resigned from board pressure.Fired?
He is busting his hump, AND, is realistic about the path forward in the Automotive market. He can't control what buyers are wanting to purchase, especially with EVs, but he can change course in reaction to demand - while at the same time planning for the future.
Hope not.Shareholders (the ones with the power to do anything) don't care about long term growth. Only short term gains for their portfolios. A reasonable leader with a vision like Farley is a liability to them. I would not be surprised at all if he resigned from board pressure.
It's what they said.With that be at the TN blue Oval City? Cuz like half of west Tennessee is counting on that to bring back their economy and growth.