now does anyone have specs on what the torque should be on this nut?2024 Ranger had the exact same issue. Easy DIY if you have a torque wrench.
Post 12now does anyone have specs on what the torque should be on this nut?
Erm... I've got a quality torque wrench, but don't you have to hold the bolt (red arrow) so you can get the correct torque on the nut (black arrow)? Otherwise, isn't the thing is just going to spin?Mine is a 12/23 build, and yikes! Passenger side had maybe 10 ft-lbf on it, driver more like 30.
Definitely don’t recommend relying on visual inspection!
Ball Joints use a shallow angle taper that is self locking and should not require holding the indicated hex in this condition. A torque wrench that will allow you to hold that hex and torque isErm... I've got a quality torque wrench, but don't you have to hold the bolt (red arrow) so you can get the correct torque on the nut (black arrow)? Otherwise, isn't the thing is just going to spin?
To do this correctly do I put the torque wrench on the bolt and hold the nut with a box wrench?
I agree with this. A castelated nut and cotter pin would keep this from being an issue. Of course, you'd still want to tighten it down to spec, but, the cotter pin would keep it from completely coming apart in the short term.Looking at the photos one can see how this is assembled at the factory.
There is a hex on the ball joint shaft that is held by the installation tool as
the nut is run down.
During my days as a Ford Mechanic, shortly after the earth cooled, Ball Joints
and Tierod ends used Castelated Nuts and cotter pins. There was a torque spec
but it did not matter as there was no guarantee that the cotter pin could be installed
at that torque. If the holes did not match, you Always tighten the nut never loosened
to install the cotter pin. This system was easily visually checked. Something the
current system can not be. I guess this is progress, but the older system was far more
fail resistant than this new system. The new system does not require as many humans
so possibly cheaper. If this system makes many of these errors it might not be cheaper!