cvalue13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2022
- Threads
- 23
- Messages
- 788
- Reaction score
- 755
- Location
- Austin, Texas
- Vehicles
- ‘22 Lightning ER Lariat
- Occupation
- Fun-Employed
Have a question on this, venturing tin-hat but seeking clarity: can someone hand-hold me through how do (or how we could confirm) that we have complete comfort that our total mi/kWh “in dash” are reflecting (A) the “all in” data (eg not just driving but also all other metrics like climate use loses, accessories, etc.), and •not* (B) some modified version that is miss-weighting the resulting mi/kWh numbers (eg ignoring everything other than driving, or driving and also accessories but not climate usage, or some other permutations)
3,000 miles in and 2.1kw, probably 90-95% around town and a fair bit of goosing the peddle for fun (in Texas, climate-wise)
masking the question in order that I understand how much is mere faith in what the dash is feeding us, vs some ability to also critique the dash’s accuracy (or choices about what’s in/out)
BTW, I have my own answer to this but don’t want to muddy/bias the confirmations or critiques that may result from asking the question
Now that it’s winter, there’s a lot of chatter out there about how “bad” the F150L is regarding range, etc., fueled by YouTube click-bait, etc., but fundamentally a true 2.1mi/kWh (if the dash is incontrovertible) should I think be a solid retort (with all the obvious caveats).
3,000 miles in and 2.1kw, probably 90-95% around town and a fair bit of goosing the peddle for fun (in Texas, climate-wise)
masking the question in order that I understand how much is mere faith in what the dash is feeding us, vs some ability to also critique the dash’s accuracy (or choices about what’s in/out)
BTW, I have my own answer to this but don’t want to muddy/bias the confirmations or critiques that may result from asking the question
Now that it’s winter, there’s a lot of chatter out there about how “bad” the F150L is regarding range, etc., fueled by YouTube click-bait, etc., but fundamentally a true 2.1mi/kWh (if the dash is incontrovertible) should I think be a solid retort (with all the obvious caveats).
Sponsored