Sponsored

Ideal Charging Practices ?

FirstF150InCasco

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2022
Threads
14
Messages
522
Reaction score
487
Location
Boston MA
Vehicles
F150 Lightning
A much better place to look than "answers on Google" or Facebook, would be your manual...

Ford recommends you charge to 90% daily, leave it plugged in so the battery can warm, and charge to 100% for trips. 80% at DC chargers, but that's because of how slow they are from 80% up.

So, instead of "some people", listen to the manufacturer. ;)
Best advice ever!!!
Sponsored

 

luebri

Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,511
Location
Neenah, WI
Vehicles
22' F150 Lightning (Lariat ER), 22' Pathfinder SL
And, if you think that charging is giving you any noticeable heat difference, that would also be wrong.
I've noticed the same the few times I did preconditioning, AC charging might not create the same intensity of heat as does DCFC session, but AC charging is adding some heat, optimizing the conservation of energy by adjusting a the clock times of these events can't hurt even if the value is trivial to modest.
My curiosity has gotten the best of me. May the research project begin. I've heard a lot of varying opinions on what charging and what level of charging It takes to "warm the battery". So last night I started my research.

I am thinking a series of tests with and without preconditioning set and 120v and various 240v amp settings (40 & 80?)

Test #1 - EVSE 120v Charging with Preconditioning Set

- AMPRoad EVSE set to 16 AMP
- Charging at 11.2 amps (per Lightning 120v limitations)
- Plugged in at 9:38 PM (65% SOC, 71.65 kWh)
- Per Car Scanner OBD App Start Temp: HVB Min 41 F/ HVB Max 42.8
- Unplugged at 7:07 AM (12.55kWh used) (70.5% SOC, 82.63kWH)
- Temp: HVB Min 53.6 F/ HVB Max 55.4
- Preconditioning was set to occur at 6:55AM
- Garage temp per Truck reading was 43 F at start and at Finish.

(I can attach screenshots if you need to see my work, but did not feel that was necessary as I am not worried about my semester grade)

My conclusion: Even 120v charging makes a temperature difference. Since Only 1.5kWh was "lost" between what the charger used and what the battery gained I would conclude that 120v was enough to warm the battery a decent amount ~12.5F.
 

Maquis

Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
May 20, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
3,373
Reaction score
4,208
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
2021 Mach-E E4-X; 2023 Lightning Lariat ER
My curiosity has gotten the best of me. May the research project begin. I've heard a lot of varying opinions on what charging and what level of charging It takes to "warm the battery". So last night I started my research.

I am thinking a series of tests with and without preconditioning set and 120v and various 240v amp settings (40 & 80?)

Test #1 - EVSE 120v Charging with Preconditioning Set

- AMPRoad EVSE set to 16 AMP
- Charging at 11.2 amps (per Lightning 120v limitations)
- Plugged in at 9:38 PM (65% SOC, 71.65 kWh)
- Per Car Scanner OBD App Start Temp: HVB Min 41 F/ HVB Max 42.8
- Unplugged at 7:07 AM (12.55kWh used) (70.5% SOC, 82.63kWH)
- Temp: HVB Min 53.6 F/ HVB Max 55.4
- Preconditioning was set to occur at 6:55AM
- Garage temp per Truck reading was 43 F at start and at Finish.

(I can attach screenshots if you need to see my work, but did not feel that was necessary as I am not worried about my semester grade)

My conclusion: Even 120v charging makes a temperature difference. Since Only 1.5kWh was "lost" between what the charger used and what the battery gained I would conclude that 120v was enough to warm the battery a decent amount ~12.5F.
My guess is that you will get the same temperature rise with everything else the same except without preconditioning. Just a guess.
 

luebri

Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,511
Location
Neenah, WI
Vehicles
22' F150 Lightning (Lariat ER), 22' Pathfinder SL
My guess is that you will get the same temperature rise with everything else the same except without preconditioning. Just a guess.
If that is the case it would validate what I do, which is set my charging window to occur very close to my morning departure time instead of right when I get home.
 

luebri

Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,511
Location
Neenah, WI
Vehicles
22' F150 Lightning (Lariat ER), 22' Pathfinder SL
Test #2 - Full 80 AMP FCSP - no Preconditioning

- Plugged in at 5:50 AM (59.5% SOC, 64.48 kWh)
- Temp: HVB Min 39.2 F/ HVB Max 42.8
- Unplugged at 7:04 AM (72.5% SOC, 85.84kWH)
- Temp: HVB Min 57.2 F/ HVB Max 60.08
- Garage temp per Truck reading was 41 F at start and at Finish.

Summary added ~18 F in 75 minutes. 21.36 kwh added
 

Sponsored

luebri

Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,511
Location
Neenah, WI
Vehicles
22' F150 Lightning (Lariat ER), 22' Pathfinder SL
Test #3 - FCSP set to 40 AMP - no Preconditioning

- Plugged in at 7:30AM (51% SOC, 53.88 kWh)
- Temp: HVB Min 39.2 F/ HVB Max 41
- Soc Check #1 (58 SOC, 65.28 kWh)
- Temp Check #1 @ 8:40 HVB Min 48.2 F/ HVB Max 48.2
- Summary added ~8 F in 70 minutes. 11.4 kwh added
- Garage temp per Truck reading was 39 F at start and at Finish.


- - - -
- Soc Check #2 (64% SOC, 73.81 kWh)
- Temp Check #2 @ 9:40 HVB Min 51.8 F/ HVB Max 51.8
- Summary added ~3 F in from 70 minutes to 130 minutes. 8.6 kwh added in 60 minutes


- - - -
- Soc Check #3 (72.5% SOC, 85.79 kWh)
- Temp Check #3 @ 11:06 HVB Min 55.4 F/ HVB Max 55.4

Total Summary added: ~26 F in 2h:26m, ~32kWh added

Conclusion thus far…. very stark difference in warming ability from 40A to 80A. I will post 60A results next.
 

Soonerjoe

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicles
2023 Lightning pro
If you have the capability, I would love to see 48 amp tested. Thanks!
 

luebri

Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,511
Location
Neenah, WI
Vehicles
22' F150 Lightning (Lariat ER), 22' Pathfinder SL
Test #4 - FCSP set to 60 AMP - with Preconditioning


- Charging set to start at 4:00AM (54.5% SOC, 57.8 kWh)
- Temp: HVB Min 39.2 F/ HVB Max 41
- Charging finished at approx 6 AM. (80.5 SOC, 96.38 kWh)
  • NOTE: I did not get the temp checked at the time in which charging technically stopped at 80.5% soc.

- Preconditioning set for 6:55 AM
- Battery temp at completion of preconditioning at 6:55 (HVB Min 57.2 F/ HVB Max 62.6)
- Garage temp per Truck reading was 39 F at start and Finish.

Summary added ~19 to 20 F in 180 minutes. 38.58 kwh added

Hypothesis? 60F is perhaps the target battery temp for Preconditioning? I will test 80 AMP with preconditioning and see how warm it gets to validate.

I also attached my energy graphs from solar to show the "blend" from charging to preconditioning

Ford F-150 Lightning Ideal Charging Practices ? Screenshot 2023-01-24 at 12.24.22 PM
 
Last edited:

cwstnsko

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
104
Reaction score
104
Location
Mesa, AZ
Vehicles
2023 F150 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Retired
Test #4 - FCSP set to 60 AMP - with Preconditioning


- Charging set to start at 4:00AM (54.5% SOC, 57.8 kWh)
- Temp: HVB Min 39.2 F/ HVB Max 41
- Charging finished at approx 6 AM. (80.5 SOC, 96.38 kWh)
  • NOTE: I did not get the temp checked at the time in which charging technically stopped at 80.5% soc.

- Preconditioning set for 6:55 AM
- Battery temp at completion of preconditioning at 6:55 (HVB Min 57.2 F/ HVB Max 62.6)
- Garage temp per Truck reading was 39 F at start and Finish.

Summary added ~19 to 20 F in 180 minutes. 38.58 kwh added

Hypothesis? 60F is perhaps the target battery temp for Preconditioning? I will test 80 AMP with preconditioning and see how warm it gets to validate.

I also attached my energy graphs from solar to show the "blend" from charging to preconditioning

Screenshot 2023-01-24 at 12.24.22 PM.png
Nice Enlighten Screenshot :)
 

luebri

Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Threads
32
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,511
Location
Neenah, WI
Vehicles
22' F150 Lightning (Lariat ER), 22' Pathfinder SL
Test #5 - FCSP set to 60 AMP - NO Preconditioning

- Charging set to start at 5:00AM (66.5% SOC, 73.36 kWh)
- Temp: HVB Min 41 F/ HVB Max 42.9
- Charging finished at 6:46 AM. (80% SOC, 95.77 kWh)
- No Preconditioning
- Battery temp at 6:46 AM (HVB Min 57.2 F/ HVB Max 60.8)
- Battery temp at Departure at 7:30 AM (HVB Min 55.4 F/ HVB Max 59)
- Garage temp per Truck reading was 41 F at start and 41 at Finish.

Summary: added ~17 F in 106 minutes. 22.41 kwh added

Hypothesis: Based on previous data, it appears 60F is the target “Precondition temp” that Ford has set. With this said, A 60 AMP 2 hour charge is plenty to fully heat the battery (at least from 40F) to that same 60 F temp. Preconditioning is only needed if you want to warm the cabin or you choose to not charge in the morning prior to departure as I advocate based on my research.

Also note. 1.8 F temp loss in 45 minutes, with ambient of 41 F, which is a bit more than I would have expected based on Darren Palmers comments but still fairly minimal.

Per @Soonerjoe request I'll do the same tests at 48A. Since 40A did not seem to be quite enough to fully warm but 60A was.

Once I do find the lowest amp setting that still fully warms the battery to 60F at 40F ambient, then I will see what that same AMP setting does outside overnight in colder temps.

I also want to do an 80 Amp with Preconditioning to validate the hypothesis of a 60F target "warm to" temp for Preconditioning.
 

Sponsored

TaxmanHog

Moderator
Moderator
First Name
Noel
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
169
Messages
12,087
Reaction score
12,709
Location
SE. Mass.
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat-ER Max Tow & 2024 Harley-Davidson Road Glide CVO-ST
Occupation
Retired
I also want to do an 80 Amp with Preconditioning to validate the hypothesis of a 60F target "warm to" temp for Preconditioning.
I'm looking forward to this test!!
 

lightspeed

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
23
Messages
527
Reaction score
605
Location
California
Vehicles
2023 Lightning Lariat ER
Also note. 1.8 F temp loss in 45 minutes, with ambient of 41 F, which is a bit more than I would have expected based on Darren Palmers comments but still fairly minimal.
Just a thought that Darren might have been thinking/speaking in Celsius which would be 1.8F per C of change.
 

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
79
Messages
4,936
Reaction score
6,501
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
Test #5 - FCSP set to 60 AMP - NO Preconditioning

- Charging set to start at 5:00AM (66.5% SOC, 73.36 kWh)
- Temp: HVB Min 41 F/ HVB Max 42.9
- Charging finished at 6:46 AM. (80% SOC, 95.77 kWh)
- No Preconditioning
- Battery temp at 6:46 AM (HVB Min 57.2 F/ HVB Max 60.8)
- Battery temp at Departure at 7:30 AM (HVB Min 55.4 F/ HVB Max 59)
- Garage temp per Truck reading was 41 F at start and 41 at Finish.

Summary: added ~17 F in 106 minutes. 22.41 kwh added

Hypothesis: Based on previous data, it appears 60F is the target “Precondition temp” that Ford has set. With this said, A 60 AMP 2 hour charge is plenty to fully heat the battery (at least from 40F) to that same 60 F temp. Preconditioning is only needed if you want to warm the cabin or you choose to not charge in the morning prior to departure as I advocate based on my research.

Also note. 1.8 F temp loss in 45 minutes, with ambient of 41 F, which is a bit more than I would have expected based on Darren Palmers comments but still fairly minimal.

Per @Soonerjoe request I'll do the same tests at 48A. Since 40A did not seem to be quite enough to fully warm but 60A was.

Once I do find the lowest amp setting that still fully warms the battery to 60F at 40F ambient, then I will see what that same AMP setting does outside overnight in colder temps.

I also want to do an 80 Amp with Preconditioning to validate the hypothesis of a 60F target "warm to" temp for Preconditioning.
Could have saved yourself some work, on the Mach-E forum they figured out that preconditioning was to 59 degrees, basically exactly what you came to.
 

TaxmanHog

Moderator
Moderator
First Name
Noel
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
169
Messages
12,087
Reaction score
12,709
Location
SE. Mass.
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat-ER Max Tow & 2024 Harley-Davidson Road Glide CVO-ST
Occupation
Retired
Could have saved yourself some work, on the Mach-E forum they figured out that preconditioning was to 59 degrees, basically exactly what you came to.
But we are not Mach-E enthusiast and don't read that forum on a regular basis, I'll admit to being a geek about things "Lightning" even if it's little brother has already tread that ground.
Sponsored

 
 





Top