Maquis
Well-known member
I think that rate doesn’t require the monthly fee. If you pay the 12.99, you get something like a 0.10 reduction in rate. Read this on the Mach-E forum.On top of $12.99 per month?! WHOLLY!
Sponsored
I think that rate doesn’t require the monthly fee. If you pay the 12.99, you get something like a 0.10 reduction in rate. Read this on the Mach-E forum.On top of $12.99 per month?! WHOLLY!
Again, $7500 for my lifetime of taxes, so, no, it’s not the same.It is a money grab - who leaves money sitting on the table? Not one of us on this forum would.
Lets be honest - the government giving $7500 to people that make up to $150K or $300K to buy an EV is just the same. It is each of us grabbing it vs a company. Its absurd that we are subsidized like that.
This isn't political, I'm just saying, who the hell leaves money on the table? At least Tesla is doing something with it. I know many successfully charge daily at EA, but there is no secret the number of problems they have.
Tell me the difference of how the two companies have used and made a difference with the money they've received. At least Tesla is making the most of it.
I can only speak for my situation, EA reliability is largely dependent on locations. The one in El Paso has very good ratings on PlugShare. So for me, it comes down to time spent driving across the city. I'm looking at about an extra hour of my time to go there vs the Tesla. So the cost difference needs to beat an hour of my time. If I combine some errands on my trip, as the EA location is a Walmart, it becomes much less.Sign up only when you need it, I do the same thing with EA. And if you do that for only when you take a trip the question becomes, would you pay $5 to not have to worry about whether the charger is working or not?
I mean they fight amongst each other now for Elon’s approval so it’s going to happen.Out here in the Rocky Mountain west we have reliable Electrify America or state operated CCS coverage everywhere Tesla is, except for parts of Wyoming, a couple parts of eastern Montana, and on I-25 between Albuquerque and Las Cruces. These CCS charging gaps will be filled within the next year, so it is not huge improvement to open up the Tesla network out in this part of the world.
That being said, it is always nice to have a back up, if you need it. If Tesla wants to charge me $.50 a kW to use the Sheridan, WY supercharger while on a road trip to Billings from Colorado to see family, then I am going to pay it. Convenience costs, and I am more than cool with that. I would rather save half a days drive to drive straight north from Colorado to Montana via I-25 than detour through Utah and Idaho like I do now.
What I am excited for is the stories that will come to light of people getting pissed at one another for breaking "the code" at a Tesla supercharger. I can't wait for the first story to be put on Youtube or on social media of people complaining about someone taking the wrong space, or taking two spaces and a fight breaks out. That will be gold!
I was thinking more road trips, but that certainly applies as well. We’re going to be driving the length of the coast in a couple of months, and for me I don’t use those chargers to know what’s ok and what’s not. In that situation I’d gladly pay the $12.99 to be sure I’m not hunting for working stations.I can only speak for my situation, EA reliability is largely dependent on locations. The one in El Paso has very good ratings on PlugShare. So for me, it comes down to time spent driving across the city. I'm looking at about an extra hour of my time to go there vs the Tesla. So the cost difference needs to beat an hour of my time. If I combine some errands on my trip, as the EA location is a Walmart, it becomes much less.
I will say, please don't judge all of us (Tesla owners) by those 40 or so that think Twitter is the new way of life and they just beg to be recognized and validated by Musk. I would like to see them silenced as much as anyone.I mean they fight amongst each other now for Elon’s approval so it’s going to happen.
If anything this should light a fire under EA to get their shit together or it will be RIP EA.
I can see Tesla eventually making a CCS section and a Tesla Section with new stations.
I mean they fight amongst each other now for Elon’s approval so it’s going to happen.
If anything this should light a fire under EA to get their shit together or it will be RIP EA.
I can see Tesla eventually making a CCS section and a Tesla Section with new stations.
The only road trip in my future has mostly reliable EA stations every 75-100 miles. I might change my tune if we try to plan a CA vacation though. Will be very interesting to see how the roll out continues.I was thinking more road trips, but that certainly applies as well. We’re going to be driving the length of the coast in a couple of months, and for me I don’t use those chargers to know what’s ok and what’s not. In that situation I’d gladly pay the $12.99 to be sure I’m not hunting for working stations.
What I’ve done in the past was called ahead to see the last charge on the EA stations, but that grows old fast.
Yes. I think most of the time it won't be an issue at all and occasionally when it is an issue people will mostly cooperate.Do you honestly think people will care about paying attention not to block more stalls? That's not going to happen. Your gas station analogy doesn't quite apply here. It rarely happens that you will get blocked to use a gas station stall because of poor utilization but even if it does, it will only take few mins, here you are talking about waiting 30-40 mins if there is poor utilization. Unless they come up with a solution, no it's not going to be ok.
|
@GDN, this is definitely not free charging and I don't think my post implied that I was looking for free charging.This wasn't about free charging. It was about convenience and having access to a charge where you didn't have it before.