• Welcome to F150Lightningforum.com everyone!

    If you're joining us from F150gen14.com, then you may already have an account here!

    If you were registered on F150gen14.com as of April 16, 2022 or earlier, then you can simply login here with the same username and password!

Sponsored

Supercharger Avg Power

vvgogh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 16, 2023
Threads
18
Messages
76
Reaction score
45
Location
Colorado
Vehicles
'23 F-150 Lightning ER
What are you getting for average power from Superchargers? Unfortunately, the charge logs don't have the curve and more informative times to 80%, but here's a few recent ones. We can only use the 250 kW chargers, so we should only be bottlenecked by what the Lightning will accept. The superchargers share power, so if you don't get a bank to yourself, you could of course see a slowdown from the sharing.
  • Rifle, CO. 14% to 84% 95.5 kWh in 58 min. Only 99 kW average despite an early peak 170 kW peak. 95F and no one else charging
  • Parachute, CO. 27% to 90%. 87.2 kWh in 54 min. 97 kW average
  • Silverthorne, CO. 47% to 70% 33.3 kWh in 14 min. 143 kW average
The Rifle and Parachute chargers are only giving around 100 kW average up to 80% despite an early 170 kW peak. I've been to both a few times and it's been a consistent experience and not tied to a shared supercharger. I'm not sure if the slowdown is on Tesla's side or Fords when it occurs. The Silverthorne experience above suggests the Lightning may not be culpable for charging slowdown.
Sponsored

 

jamelski

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2024
Threads
3
Messages
64
Reaction score
69
Location
Sacramento
Vehicles
2024 Lariat
Ford F-150 Lightning Supercharger Avg Power 3EDFCCBC-1FB9-4E12-BD76-48DE3E6AFBC0

we all know why they are slowed down on non Tesla come on šŸ˜‚
 

ericpullen

Well-known member
First Name
Eric
Joined
Jan 4, 2022
Threads
29
Messages
223
Reaction score
425
Location
Louisville, KY
Vehicles
22 F-150 Lightning & 22 Mach-E
Ford F-150 Lightning Supercharger Avg Power IMG_8516

This was from my trip last weekend. It did slow down to around 109kW as it got above 80%
 

Zprime29

Well-known member
First Name
Brandon
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Threads
37
Messages
1,818
Reaction score
1,849
Location
Tucson, AZ
Vehicles
Honda Pilot, 2022 Lightning ER
Average speed will always be slower when you go past 80%, due to the curve dropping off the cliff there.
 

Antimater

Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Nov 20, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
7
Reaction score
20
Location
Ca
Vehicles
2023 F150 Lightning Lariat ER
I got a steady 188kW at a SC in Vegas last week from 50 to 70%

Ford F-150 Lightning Supercharger Avg Power IMG_1506.PNG
 

Sponsored

Maquis

Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
May 20, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
3,241
Reaction score
4,012
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
2021 Mach-E E4-X; 2023 Lightning Lariat ER
This was from my trip last weekend. It did slow down to around 109kW as it got above 80%
No one has ever seen over 40-ish KW above 80% before.
I donā€™t know if youā€™re lucky or cursed. šŸ˜€
 

Grease Lightning

Well-known member
First Name
Johnathan
Joined
Sep 6, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
440
Reaction score
625
Location
Albany, Oregon USA
Vehicles
2023 F-150 Lightning XLT
I'm not sure if the slowdown is on Tesla's side or Fords when it occurs.
The slowdown is your state of charge. Going over 80% and the kWh tanks, go over 85% and it tanks even more.

So your three examples are not scientifically relevant as the variable are extremely different
 

FLSpartan04

Well-known member
First Name
Daryl
Joined
Mar 10, 2024
Threads
3
Messages
153
Reaction score
172
Location
Florida
Vehicles
23 F150 Lightning XLT ER
No one has ever seen over 40-ish KW above 80% before.
I donā€™t know if youā€™re lucky or cursed. šŸ˜€
Mine would reliably go to 60 kW at 80. Never charged above 85 so I donā€™t know when it drops next, but it seemed like 60 was the requested power at 80%.
 

Firn

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
58
Reaction score
49
Location
USA
Vehicles
23 Pro ER
Mine would reliably go to 60 kW at 80. Never charged above 85 so I donā€™t know when it drops next, but it seemed like 60 was the requested power at 80%.
Same


Op, ambient temp appeared to make a big difference for me. In the 90s and my speed would drop to around 100, but when charging in the 70s it was around 123.
Superchargers have been the fastest and most reliable chargers for me. I have not done a ton of fast charging but SC sites always supplied more power and we're more consistent

Gen 1 tesla chargers would share power between two stalls but that is not true for v2 and up. The only limit may be if it nears all stalls being occupied and they hit the limit for the entire site.
 

3rdgenfan

Well-known member
First Name
Geoff
Joined
Oct 4, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
322
Reaction score
344
Location
Delaware
Vehicles
'23 XLT SR, G8 GXP, TDI Rabbit
I saw the speeds peaked at 165 or so for me on my trip up to Maine last week, would settle in between 109-115 after the initial boost and then go to 45 once it hit 80 which seemed normal. I'm sure I could have gotten a faster charge to 80% but in the end using the Tesla network saved me quite a bit of time over last years trip north between derated charges and waiting in line for one to open up.
 

Sponsored

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
76
Messages
4,740
Reaction score
6,173
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
I don't believe that the V3 or V4 locations share power like you think, it is the older locations.
 

Ventorum94

Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
224
Reaction score
322
Location
FL
Vehicles
Chev Avalanche, BMW 550i, Tesla MY, Tesla M3
Occupation
Mechanical Engineer
What are you getting for average power from Superchargers? Unfortunately, the charge logs don't have the curve and more informative times to 80%, but here's a few recent ones. We can only use the 250 kW chargers, so we should only be bottlenecked by what the Lightning will accept. The superchargers share power, so if you don't get a bank to yourself, you could of course see a slowdown from the sharing.
  • Rifle, CO. 14% to 84% 95.5 kWh in 58 min. Only 99 kW average despite an early peak 170 kW peak. 95F and no one else charging
  • Parachute, CO. 27% to 90%. 87.2 kWh in 54 min. 97 kW average
  • Silverthorne, CO. 47% to 70% 33.3 kWh in 14 min. 143 kW average
The Rifle and Parachute chargers are only giving around 100 kW average up to 80% despite an early 170 kW peak. I've been to both a few times and it's been a consistent experience and not tied to a shared supercharger. I'm not sure if the slowdown is on Tesla's side or Fords when it occurs. The Silverthorne experience above suggests the Lightning may not be culpable for charging slowdown.
We are bottlenecked by the CURRENT output of the charger (500A); itā€™s not the kW rating of the charger that determines how fast our Lightnings charge, itā€™s the maximum current output, which is 500A at an EA 350 or Tesla SC. The relatively low voltage of our Lightningā€™s battery pack (mid-300V) means we can never see more than about 170kW from 500A.
340V x 500A = 170,000W or 170kW (get it?)
If the Lightning had been designed with a higher voltage battery pack, we might see higher charging rates from the available 500A; but, thatā€™s the way it is, and it isnā€™t going to change. Itā€™s highly unlikely anyoneā€™s going to make a DCFC that outputs more than 500A. So, if youā€™re seeing about 170kW on a DCFC, you are getting the fastest charging possible on our Lightnings.

**if the DCFC is limited to less than 500A (say, 350A) then we get even less charging kW:
340V x 350A = 119kW
When chargers are ā€œadministrativelyā€ de-rated, itā€™s the current (amps) output that gets throttled down.
 
Last edited:

Danface

Well-known member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Sep 19, 2023
Threads
2
Messages
597
Reaction score
527
Location
Central Mass
Vehicles
2023 Lightning XLT
I wonder how long the "mishmash" of charging station station outputs and costs per kWh will last. It doesn't feel like the normal "market forces" are at work yet. I understand that this is still new for CCS (so to speak) and Tesla has an early start with a built in audience and federal money is involved at the state level etc etc but it's crazy to have such a broad range of costs, charging rates and availability. Ah well, love the truck and willing to navigate the hodge podge
 

Tony Burgh

Well-known member
First Name
Tony
Joined
Sep 28, 2021
Threads
17
Messages
839
Reaction score
920
Location
Western Pennsylvania
Vehicles
22 Lariat ER
Occupation
Retired
Just some data for your enjoyment.
I made a 500 mile round trip on PA Turnpike to Hershey this week. I charged at EA in Bedford twice (53% to 82% and 22% to 61%, both 56Ā¢/ kWh) and Tesla (36% to 80%, 45Ā¢/kWh) in Mechanicsburg once.
All three averaged 2 kWh/minute. EA peeked at 174 kW and Tesla peeked about 140 kW.
Speed averaged around 75 mph. Used BC about half the time.
 
OP
OP

vvgogh

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 16, 2023
Threads
18
Messages
76
Reaction score
45
Location
Colorado
Vehicles
'23 F-150 Lightning ER
Ford specifies 15-80% DC fast charging for ER (85 kWh) at taking 41 min. So, 125 kW is the average charging power specification. My slower experiences at Superchargers are delivering 80% of the Ford spec. This adds 10 min totaling to 51 min for 85 kWh.
Sponsored

 
 





Top